Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Assessment of durability of airtightness by means of repeated testing of 4 passive houses

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F18%3A00331181" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/18:00331181 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Assessment of durability of airtightness by means of repeated testing of 4 passive houses

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Durability of building airtightness was assessed by means of repeated airtightness testing of the studied houses over a period of 11 years. All the tests were performed by the same technician using the same equipment. The technician always prepared the building in the same way and followed the same measuring procedure. The majority of the tests were carried out in the same period of year under similar climatic conditions. The differences between the test results should reflect namely the impact of ageing and the impact of the air barrier system modifications. Information concerning interventions to the building envelope was collected from the building users or the caretaker. The impact of such interventions on the building airtightness is traceable. The buildings were built in 2007 using the same construction system with an emphasis on the quality of execution of the air barrier system. They have a very similar size, the same timber structure and the same air barrier system (PE foil, butyl tapes). Building A and D are an inhabited single family houses. Building B is a showhouse of the construction company and the building C serves as training centre and conference room. This allows a comparison of the potential impact of different users’ behaviour on the airtightness durability. In all the buildings, airtightness has deteriorated over 11 years. The n50 of buildings A and B increased from 0.5 h-1 to 0.7 h-1. The n50 of building C and D increased more significantly (due to interventions into the air barrier system carried out with little concern about airtightness). Good airtightness durability can be achieved if: - the air barrier system is designed and executed carefully - the users respect some basic restrictions concerning the modifications of the building envelope - all interventions into the air barrier system are properly repaired The results confirm that the airtightness decreases namely during the first years of the building service.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Assessment of durability of airtightness by means of repeated testing of 4 passive houses

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Durability of building airtightness was assessed by means of repeated airtightness testing of the studied houses over a period of 11 years. All the tests were performed by the same technician using the same equipment. The technician always prepared the building in the same way and followed the same measuring procedure. The majority of the tests were carried out in the same period of year under similar climatic conditions. The differences between the test results should reflect namely the impact of ageing and the impact of the air barrier system modifications. Information concerning interventions to the building envelope was collected from the building users or the caretaker. The impact of such interventions on the building airtightness is traceable. The buildings were built in 2007 using the same construction system with an emphasis on the quality of execution of the air barrier system. They have a very similar size, the same timber structure and the same air barrier system (PE foil, butyl tapes). Building A and D are an inhabited single family houses. Building B is a showhouse of the construction company and the building C serves as training centre and conference room. This allows a comparison of the potential impact of different users’ behaviour on the airtightness durability. In all the buildings, airtightness has deteriorated over 11 years. The n50 of buildings A and B increased from 0.5 h-1 to 0.7 h-1. The n50 of building C and D increased more significantly (due to interventions into the air barrier system carried out with little concern about airtightness). Good airtightness durability can be achieved if: - the air barrier system is designed and executed carefully - the users respect some basic restrictions concerning the modifications of the building envelope - all interventions into the air barrier system are properly repaired The results confirm that the airtightness decreases namely during the first years of the building service.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20103 - Architecture engineering

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2018

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    39th AIVC Conference 7th TightVent Conference 5th venticool Conference Smart Ventilation for buildings Proceedings

  • ISBN

    978-2-930471-53-2

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    10

  • Strana od-do

    55-64

  • Název nakladatele

    AIVC INIVE EEIG

  • Místo vydání

    Brussels

  • Místo konání akce

    Antibes Juan-Les-Pins

  • Datum konání akce

    18. 9. 2018

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku