Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

RISKENESS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CONCEPT

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F21%3A00351792" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/21:00351792 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2021.20.TF184" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2021.20.TF184</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.22616/ERDev.2021.20.TF184" target="_blank" >10.22616/ERDev.2021.20.TF184</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    RISKENESS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CONCEPT

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Insufficiently functioning infrastructure (whether agricultural, healthcare or transport) is one of the biggest obstacles to general economic development of any economy. The use of the public-private partnership (PPP) concept is very tempting for any government as it represents an extra-budgetary source for the investments’ financing. It allows participation of the private sector in various projects ranging from agricultural irrigation to the highway construction. It brings its capital, know-how and experience for financing, construction, operation and maintenance of the service standardly provided by the public sector. This paper lists all standard sources of public infrastructure funding. Considering the differing conditions and possible profitability for various countries, general or project-dedicated government bonds were evaluated and proposed to be the most advantageous extra-budgetary alternative source of funding. In case the public sector has enough credibility for a successful bonds’ issuance, it is financially advantageous to use raised money for the capital expenses of the construction project instead of the more expensive private capital’s involvement. Two case studies of the currently ongoing PPP projects were used to prove its higher expensiveness in comparison to the economical results of the bonds’ issuance. Assessing most important known aspects and problematic issues of the PPP concept and comparing it to the other usual sources and methods of financing, this paper confirms the hypothesis of the PPP’s overall higher complexity and expensiveness.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    RISKENESS OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CONCEPT

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Insufficiently functioning infrastructure (whether agricultural, healthcare or transport) is one of the biggest obstacles to general economic development of any economy. The use of the public-private partnership (PPP) concept is very tempting for any government as it represents an extra-budgetary source for the investments’ financing. It allows participation of the private sector in various projects ranging from agricultural irrigation to the highway construction. It brings its capital, know-how and experience for financing, construction, operation and maintenance of the service standardly provided by the public sector. This paper lists all standard sources of public infrastructure funding. Considering the differing conditions and possible profitability for various countries, general or project-dedicated government bonds were evaluated and proposed to be the most advantageous extra-budgetary alternative source of funding. In case the public sector has enough credibility for a successful bonds’ issuance, it is financially advantageous to use raised money for the capital expenses of the construction project instead of the more expensive private capital’s involvement. Two case studies of the currently ongoing PPP projects were used to prove its higher expensiveness in comparison to the economical results of the bonds’ issuance. Assessing most important known aspects and problematic issues of the PPP concept and comparing it to the other usual sources and methods of financing, this paper confirms the hypothesis of the PPP’s overall higher complexity and expensiveness.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20104 - Transport engineering

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    20th International Scientific Conference ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT Proceedings, Volume 20

  • ISBN

  • ISSN

    1691-5976

  • e-ISSN

    1691-5976

  • Počet stran výsledku

    6

  • Strana od-do

    813-818

  • Název nakladatele

    Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

  • Místo vydání

    Jelgava

  • Místo konání akce

    Jelgava

  • Datum konání akce

    26. 5. 2021

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku