Types of Mobile Mapping Approaches Compared to Static Terrestrial Scanning

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F25%3A00383581" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/25:00383581 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://fin.uni-pr.edu/page.aspx?id=1,167" target="_blank" >https://fin.uni-pr.edu/page.aspx?id=1,167</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Types of Mobile Mapping Approaches Compared to Static Terrestrial Scanning

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article evaluates and compares two modern spatial data acquisition technologies, mobile mapping, and static terrestrial scanning, in terms of data collection and processing effort, accuracy, and integrity of the resulting point clouds. Mobile mapping contains a group of tools that use moving media such as vehicles or pedestrian surveys to collect data. Three types of mobile mapping devices were tested: spherical imaging followed by reconstruction using SfM (Structure from Motion) to create point clouds; the Faro Orbis mobile laser scanner that rapidly collects data indoors and outdoors using a combination of laser scanning, an inertial unit (INS), and SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping); and the VMX-2HA vehicle-mounted mobile mapping system using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), INS, and SLAM for mass data collection in exterior. A Trimble X7 scanning system was used for static scanning, and the resulting reference point clouds were created by combining several survey stations. The results show the differences between the types of mobile mapping methods and their advantages, also compared to static scanning. SfM from spherical imagery is suitable for creating models with lower accuracy and density requirements for point clouds, while Faro Orbis and VMX-2HA provide the flexibility to collect data with varying levels of accuracy and detail in interiors and exteriors. The choice between these methods depends on the specific requirements of the project. This paper provides an overview and comparison of key parameters to facilitate the selection of the appropriate technology for a given application.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Types of Mobile Mapping Approaches Compared to Static Terrestrial Scanning

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article evaluates and compares two modern spatial data acquisition technologies, mobile mapping, and static terrestrial scanning, in terms of data collection and processing effort, accuracy, and integrity of the resulting point clouds. Mobile mapping contains a group of tools that use moving media such as vehicles or pedestrian surveys to collect data. Three types of mobile mapping devices were tested: spherical imaging followed by reconstruction using SfM (Structure from Motion) to create point clouds; the Faro Orbis mobile laser scanner that rapidly collects data indoors and outdoors using a combination of laser scanning, an inertial unit (INS), and SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping); and the VMX-2HA vehicle-mounted mobile mapping system using the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), INS, and SLAM for mass data collection in exterior. A Trimble X7 scanning system was used for static scanning, and the resulting reference point clouds were created by combining several survey stations. The results show the differences between the types of mobile mapping methods and their advantages, also compared to static scanning. SfM from spherical imagery is suitable for creating models with lower accuracy and density requirements for point clouds, while Faro Orbis and VMX-2HA provide the flexibility to collect data with varying levels of accuracy and detail in interiors and exteriors. The choice between these methods depends on the specific requirements of the project. This paper provides an overview and comparison of key parameters to facilitate the selection of the appropriate technology for a given application.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20101 - Civil engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Book of Proceedings : Second International Student Conference of Civil Engineering (ISCCE 2024)

ISBN

978-9951-00-370-4

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

586-593

Název nakladatele

University of Pristina

Místo vydání

Pristina

Místo konání akce

Civil Engineering Faculty, Prishtina

Datum konání akce

25. 4. 2024

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—