Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Tram-pedestrian collisions: The severity of head injuries due to secondary impact with the surrounding infrastructure (ground)

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F22%3A00363437" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/22:00363437 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCME55909.2022.9988616" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCME55909.2022.9988616</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICECCME55909.2022.9988616" target="_blank" >10.1109/ICECCME55909.2022.9988616</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Tram-pedestrian collisions: The severity of head injuries due to secondary impact with the surrounding infrastructure (ground)

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The goal of the study was to conduct a series of tram-pedestrian collisions to assess the head injuries as the result of the secondary impact with the surrounding infrastructure (ground). The crash tests were conducted with an anthropomorphic test device for two collision scenarios: the initial frontal and side impact with a tram. Four tram types travelling at four different speeds (5 km/h, 10 km/h, 15 km/h, 20 km/h) were used. The primary outcome variable was the resultant head acceleration. The risk and severity of possible head injuries were assessed using the head injury criterion (HIC15). The results showed increasing head impacts with increasing speed for all tram types and collisions. The higher values of head acceleration were reached during the frontal impact (97–1677 g) compared to the side one (19–607 g). The HIC15 values showed a similar trend, exceeding the value of 1000 consistently during the initial frontal impact compared to the side one. This corresponded to a very high probability of AIS4+ injuries in the case of initial frontal impact. The secondary impact with the surrounding infrastructure was found more dangerous in the case of initial frontal impact, possibly resulting in more severe injuries. However, both collision scenarios showed much higher values compared to the primary impact between a tram and pedestrian.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Tram-pedestrian collisions: The severity of head injuries due to secondary impact with the surrounding infrastructure (ground)

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The goal of the study was to conduct a series of tram-pedestrian collisions to assess the head injuries as the result of the secondary impact with the surrounding infrastructure (ground). The crash tests were conducted with an anthropomorphic test device for two collision scenarios: the initial frontal and side impact with a tram. Four tram types travelling at four different speeds (5 km/h, 10 km/h, 15 km/h, 20 km/h) were used. The primary outcome variable was the resultant head acceleration. The risk and severity of possible head injuries were assessed using the head injury criterion (HIC15). The results showed increasing head impacts with increasing speed for all tram types and collisions. The higher values of head acceleration were reached during the frontal impact (97–1677 g) compared to the side one (19–607 g). The HIC15 values showed a similar trend, exceeding the value of 1000 consistently during the initial frontal impact compared to the side one. This corresponded to a very high probability of AIS4+ injuries in the case of initial frontal impact. The secondary impact with the surrounding infrastructure was found more dangerous in the case of initial frontal impact, possibly resulting in more severe injuries. However, both collision scenarios showed much higher values compared to the primary impact between a tram and pedestrian.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    D - Stať ve sborníku

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20301 - Mechanical engineering

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název statě ve sborníku

    2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering, ICECCME 2022

  • ISBN

    9781665470957

  • ISSN

  • e-ISSN

  • Počet stran výsledku

    6

  • Strana od-do

  • Název nakladatele

    Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.

  • Místo vydání

  • Místo konání akce

    Male

  • Datum konání akce

    16. 12. 2022

  • Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

    WRD - Celosvětová akce

  • Kód UT WoS článku