CFD Analysis of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Rheological Tests
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F24%3A00372443" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/24:00372443 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9020045" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9020045</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/fluids9020045" target="_blank" >10.3390/fluids9020045</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
CFD Analysis of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Rheological Tests
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This study connects and compares the results from two different rheological measurement techniques, namely, the slump test and rotational rheometry, on UHPC (Ultra-High-Performance Concrete) through the use of commercially available numerical simulation software ANSYS Fluent 2022 R2. The workability and resulting mechanical properties of the UHPC (a material used in construction) are highly dependent on its rheology and, hence, also on the composition and level of homogeneity of the assessed mixture. It is generally understood that the most suitable rheological model for concrete mixtures is the Hershel–Bulkley model. However, obtaining reliable rheological data is complicated as the wide-gap rotational rheometers developed for concrete show bias in their measurements even on precise laboratory equipment, while common industrial tests, such as the slump test, do not produce the usual shear rate–shear stress relation and, hence, do not allow for more complex analysis. Recently, a new methodology for the rheological measurement of non-Newtonian fluids that utilises a simple power input–rotation speed measurement was published. However, in this study, only model liquids were evaluated, and the method was not validated for more complex fluids such as pastes. Therefore, it was the goal of this study to show this method’s suitability for fine pastes through a comparison with the slump test, using numerical simulation.
Název v anglickém jazyce
CFD Analysis of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Rheological Tests
Popis výsledku anglicky
This study connects and compares the results from two different rheological measurement techniques, namely, the slump test and rotational rheometry, on UHPC (Ultra-High-Performance Concrete) through the use of commercially available numerical simulation software ANSYS Fluent 2022 R2. The workability and resulting mechanical properties of the UHPC (a material used in construction) are highly dependent on its rheology and, hence, also on the composition and level of homogeneity of the assessed mixture. It is generally understood that the most suitable rheological model for concrete mixtures is the Hershel–Bulkley model. However, obtaining reliable rheological data is complicated as the wide-gap rotational rheometers developed for concrete show bias in their measurements even on precise laboratory equipment, while common industrial tests, such as the slump test, do not produce the usual shear rate–shear stress relation and, hence, do not allow for more complex analysis. Recently, a new methodology for the rheological measurement of non-Newtonian fluids that utilises a simple power input–rotation speed measurement was published. However, in this study, only model liquids were evaluated, and the method was not validated for more complex fluids such as pastes. Therefore, it was the goal of this study to show this method’s suitability for fine pastes through a comparison with the slump test, using numerical simulation.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20501 - Materials engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA21-24070S" target="_blank" >GA21-24070S: Model segregace vláken v závislosti na reologických vlastnostech čerstvého HPC</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Fluids (online)
ISSN
2311-5521
e-ISSN
2311-5521
Svazek periodika
9
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
001172446700001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85185938420