On the Selection of the Most Appropriate MPC Problem Formulation for Buildings
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F13%3A00207931" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/13:00207931 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
On the Selection of the Most Appropriate MPC Problem Formulation for Buildings
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Model Predictive Control (MPC) for buildings has gained a lot of attention recently. It has been shown that MPC can achieve significant energy savings in the range between 15-30% compared to a conventional control strategy, e.g., to a rule-based controller. However, there exist several reports showing that the performance of MPC can be inferior to that of a well-tuned conventional controller. Possible reasons are at hand: i) minimization is typically not performed over energy but instead over some inputquantity that has a different meaning, ii) a model mismatch and inaccuracies in weather predictions can cause wrong predictions of future behavior which can result in undesirable behavior of the control signal (e.g. oscillations) and, as a consequence,in increase in energy consumption. This behavior has been observed when applying one of the widely used economic MPC formulation to the building of Czech Technical University in Prague. These oscillations are not an issue for buildings on
Název v anglickém jazyce
On the Selection of the Most Appropriate MPC Problem Formulation for Buildings
Popis výsledku anglicky
Model Predictive Control (MPC) for buildings has gained a lot of attention recently. It has been shown that MPC can achieve significant energy savings in the range between 15-30% compared to a conventional control strategy, e.g., to a rule-based controller. However, there exist several reports showing that the performance of MPC can be inferior to that of a well-tuned conventional controller. Possible reasons are at hand: i) minimization is typically not performed over energy but instead over some inputquantity that has a different meaning, ii) a model mismatch and inaccuracies in weather predictions can cause wrong predictions of future behavior which can result in undesirable behavior of the control signal (e.g. oscillations) and, as a consequence,in increase in energy consumption. This behavior has been observed when applying one of the widely used economic MPC formulation to the building of Czech Technical University in Prague. These oscillations are not an issue for buildings on
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
BC - Teorie a systémy řízení
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/ED2.1.00%2F03.0091" target="_blank" >ED2.1.00/03.0091: Univerzitní centrum energeticky efektivních budov (UCEEB)</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2013
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Clima 2013 - 11th REHVA World Congress & 8th International Conference on IAQVEC - "Energy Efficient, Smart and Healthy Buildings"
ISBN
978-80-260-4001-9
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
624-634
Název nakladatele
Společnost pro techniku prostředí
Místo vydání
Praha
Místo konání akce
Praha
Datum konání akce
16. 6. 2013
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
EUR - Evropská akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—