Assessing flexibility options in electricity market clearing

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F23%3A00363749" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/23:00363749 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.113084" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.113084</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.113084" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.rser.2022.113084</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Assessing flexibility options in electricity market clearing

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This work presents a model to co-optimize the energy and reserves markets, taking into account the penetration and participation of various flexibility providers in both markets. In particular, a detailed unit commitment model has been developed based on mixed-integer programming techniques incorporating energy storage systems with both charging and discharging options, electric vehicles with both grid-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-grid modes, and demand response programs for cost-optimal energy and ancillary services scheduling. The balancing services considered include Frequency Containment Reserves (FCR), automatic Frequency Restoration Reserves (aFRR), and manual Frequency Restoration Reserves (mFRR), in both upward and downward directions. The impact of all these flexibility providers on operational and economic aspects has been assessed through an illustrative case study of a power system with high penetration of renewable energy sources, including thermal and hydroelectric power units. The results highlight the superiority of results when considering the participation of all flexibility providers, especially in the ancillary services market, in terms of economic competitiveness, renewable energy curtailment, associated CO2 emissions, and utilization of costly energy resources. The growing share of flexibility providers in both energy management and reserve provision mix highlights the importance of these sources for power mixes with low carbon content. The methodological framework developed can be employed by system operators, market participants, and policymakers to provide price signals and optimize their resources and portfolios.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Assessing flexibility options in electricity market clearing

Popis výsledku anglicky

This work presents a model to co-optimize the energy and reserves markets, taking into account the penetration and participation of various flexibility providers in both markets. In particular, a detailed unit commitment model has been developed based on mixed-integer programming techniques incorporating energy storage systems with both charging and discharging options, electric vehicles with both grid-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-grid modes, and demand response programs for cost-optimal energy and ancillary services scheduling. The balancing services considered include Frequency Containment Reserves (FCR), automatic Frequency Restoration Reserves (aFRR), and manual Frequency Restoration Reserves (mFRR), in both upward and downward directions. The impact of all these flexibility providers on operational and economic aspects has been assessed through an illustrative case study of a power system with high penetration of renewable energy sources, including thermal and hydroelectric power units. The results highlight the superiority of results when considering the participation of all flexibility providers, especially in the ancillary services market, in terms of economic competitiveness, renewable energy curtailment, associated CO2 emissions, and utilization of costly energy resources. The growing share of flexibility providers in both energy management and reserve provision mix highlights the importance of these sources for power mixes with low carbon content. The methodological framework developed can be employed by system operators, market participants, and policymakers to provide price signals and optimize their resources and portfolios.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20704 - Energy and fuels

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

ISSN

1364-0321

e-ISSN

1879-0690

Svazek periodika

173

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

March

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

000901972900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85143796577