Cautious Specialization of Strategy Schedules (Extended Abstract)
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F24%3A00380249" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/24:00380249 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68407700:21730/24:00380249
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3717/short2.pdf" target="_blank" >https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3717/short2.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Cautious Specialization of Strategy Schedules (Extended Abstract)
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Combining theorem proving strategies into schedules is a well-known recipe for improving prover performance, as a well-chosen set of complementary strategies in practice covers many more problems within a predetermined time budget than a single strategy could. A strategy schedule can be a monolithic sequence, but may also consist of multiple schedule branches, intended to be selected based on certain problem’s features and thus to specialize in solving the corresponding problem classes. When allowing schedule branching, there is an intuitive trade-off between covering the known (training) problems quickly, by splitting them into many classes, and the generalization of the obtained branching schedule, i.e., its ability to solve previously unseen (test) problems. In this paper, we attempt to shed more light on this trade-off. Starting off with a large set of proving strategies of the automatic theorem prover Vampire evaluated on the first-order part of the TPTP library, we report on two preliminary experiments with building branching schedules while keeping track of how well they generalize to test problems. We hope to attract more attention to the exciting topic of schedule construction by this work-in-progress report.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Cautious Specialization of Strategy Schedules (Extended Abstract)
Popis výsledku anglicky
Combining theorem proving strategies into schedules is a well-known recipe for improving prover performance, as a well-chosen set of complementary strategies in practice covers many more problems within a predetermined time budget than a single strategy could. A strategy schedule can be a monolithic sequence, but may also consist of multiple schedule branches, intended to be selected based on certain problem’s features and thus to specialize in solving the corresponding problem classes. When allowing schedule branching, there is an intuitive trade-off between covering the known (training) problems quickly, by splitting them into many classes, and the generalization of the obtained branching schedule, i.e., its ability to solve previously unseen (test) problems. In this paper, we attempt to shed more light on this trade-off. Starting off with a large set of proving strategies of the automatic theorem prover Vampire evaluated on the first-order part of the TPTP library, we report on two preliminary experiments with building branching schedules while keeping track of how well they generalize to test problems. We hope to attract more attention to the exciting topic of schedule construction by this work-in-progress report.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA24-12759S" target="_blank" >GA24-12759S: Tvárné architektury pro automatické dokazování vět</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Practical Aspects of Automated Reasoning and Satisfiability Checking and Symbolic Computation Workshop 2024
ISBN
—
ISSN
1613-0073
e-ISSN
1613-0073
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
28-36
Název nakladatele
CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Místo vydání
Aachen
Místo konání akce
Nancy
Datum konání akce
1. 7. 2024
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—