Comparative Evaluation of 3D Reconstruction Methods for Object Pose Estimation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F25%3A00385896" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/25:00385896 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68407700:21730/25:00385896
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV61041.2025.00745" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV61041.2025.00745</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/WACV61041.2025.00745" target="_blank" >10.1109/WACV61041.2025.00745</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Comparative Evaluation of 3D Reconstruction Methods for Object Pose Estimation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Current generalizable object pose estimators, i.e., approaches that do not need to be trained per object, rely on accurate 3D models. Predominantly, CAD models are used, which can be hard to obtain in practice. At the same time, it is often possible to acquire images of an object. Naturally, this leads to the question of whether 3D models reconstructed from images are sufficient to facilitate accurate object pose estimation. We aim to answer this question by proposing a novel benchmark for measuring the impact of 3D reconstruction quality on pose estimation accuracy. Our benchmark provides calibrated images suitable for reconstruction and registered with the test images of the YCB-V dataset for pose evaluation under the BOP benchmark format. Detailed experiments with multiple state-of-the-art 3D reconstruction and object pose estimation approaches show that the geometry produced by modern reconstruction methods is often sufficient for accurate pose estimation. Our experiments lead to interesting observations: (1) Standard metrics for measuring 3D reconstruction quality are not necessarily indicative of pose estimation accuracy, which shows the need for dedicated benchmarks such as ours. (2) Classical, non-learning-based approaches can perform on par with modern learning-based reconstruction techniques and can even offer a better reconstruction time-pose accuracy tradeoff. (3) There is still a sizable gap between performance with reconstructed and with CAD models. To foster research on closing this gap, the benchmark is made available at https://github.com/VarunBurde/reconstruction_pose_benchmark.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Comparative Evaluation of 3D Reconstruction Methods for Object Pose Estimation
Popis výsledku anglicky
Current generalizable object pose estimators, i.e., approaches that do not need to be trained per object, rely on accurate 3D models. Predominantly, CAD models are used, which can be hard to obtain in practice. At the same time, it is often possible to acquire images of an object. Naturally, this leads to the question of whether 3D models reconstructed from images are sufficient to facilitate accurate object pose estimation. We aim to answer this question by proposing a novel benchmark for measuring the impact of 3D reconstruction quality on pose estimation accuracy. Our benchmark provides calibrated images suitable for reconstruction and registered with the test images of the YCB-V dataset for pose evaluation under the BOP benchmark format. Detailed experiments with multiple state-of-the-art 3D reconstruction and object pose estimation approaches show that the geometry produced by modern reconstruction methods is often sufficient for accurate pose estimation. Our experiments lead to interesting observations: (1) Standard metrics for measuring 3D reconstruction quality are not necessarily indicative of pose estimation accuracy, which shows the need for dedicated benchmarks such as ours. (2) Classical, non-learning-based approaches can perform on par with modern learning-based reconstruction techniques and can even offer a better reconstruction time-pose accuracy tradeoff. (3) There is still a sizable gap between performance with reconstructed and with CAD models. To foster research on closing this gap, the benchmark is made available at https://github.com/VarunBurde/reconstruction_pose_benchmark.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
ISBN
979-8-3315-1084-8
ISSN
2472-6737
e-ISSN
2642-9381
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
7669-7681
Název nakladatele
IEEE
Místo vydání
Piscataway
Místo konání akce
Tucson
Datum konání akce
28. 2. 2025
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
001521272600255