Quality Measurement of Functional Requirements
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21240%2F23%3A00367135" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21240/23:00367135 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5220/0012148700003538" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5220/0012148700003538</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0012148700003538" target="_blank" >10.5220/0012148700003538</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Quality Measurement of Functional Requirements
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
In this contribution, we propose a metric to measure the quality of textual functional requirements specifications. Since the main problem of such requirements specifications is their ambiguity, incompleteness, and inconsistency, we developed textual patterns to reveal shortcomings in these properties. As a component of our analysis, we use not only the text of the requirements but also the UML model that we construct during the text analysis. Combining the results of part-of-speech tagging of the text and the modeled properties, we are able to identify a number of irregularities concerning the properties named above. Then, the text needs human intervention to correct or remove the suspicious formulations. As a measure of the requirements specification quality, we denote the number of necessary human interventions. We implemented a tool called TEMOS that can test ambiguity, incompleteness, and inconsistency, and we use its results to evaluate the quality of textual requirements. In this paper, we summarize our project results.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Quality Measurement of Functional Requirements
Popis výsledku anglicky
In this contribution, we propose a metric to measure the quality of textual functional requirements specifications. Since the main problem of such requirements specifications is their ambiguity, incompleteness, and inconsistency, we developed textual patterns to reveal shortcomings in these properties. As a component of our analysis, we use not only the text of the requirements but also the UML model that we construct during the text analysis. Combining the results of part-of-speech tagging of the text and the modeled properties, we are able to identify a number of irregularities concerning the properties named above. Then, the text needs human intervention to correct or remove the suspicious formulations. As a measure of the requirements specification quality, we denote the number of necessary human interventions. We implemented a tool called TEMOS that can test ambiguity, incompleteness, and inconsistency, and we use its results to evaluate the quality of textual requirements. In this paper, we summarize our project results.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10201 - Computer sciences, information science, bioinformathics (hardware development to be 2.2, social aspect to be 5.8)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Technologies
ISBN
978-989-758-665-1
ISSN
2184-2833
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
8
Strana od-do
736-743
Název nakladatele
SciTePress - Science and Technology Publications
Místo vydání
Porto
Místo konání akce
Rome
Datum konání akce
10. 7. 2023
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
—