Experiences with Risk Management in the Czech Republic
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21260%2F11%3A00188975" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21260/11:00188975 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Experiences with Risk Management in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
At present the risk is for engineering practice expressed as probable size of losses, damages and harms on followed assets that are caused by a given disaster with specified size in real site characterised by real vulnerabilities of followed assets, thatare rescheduled for certain time unit (usually 1 year) and certain territory unit. The principal attributes of each risk are uncertainty and vagueness, and therefore special approaches and methods must be used if we want to obtain qualified results forpractice. The paper compares three concepts of engineering disciplines based on risk management that have been used at present practice, i.e. the classical risk engineering, the security engineering and the safety engineering. It shows their common features and main disparities that lead to different level of safety of followed facility. It shows the results obtained by the systematic research of disasters and their risk on the basis of data from the Czech Republic.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Experiences with Risk Management in the Czech Republic
Popis výsledku anglicky
At present the risk is for engineering practice expressed as probable size of losses, damages and harms on followed assets that are caused by a given disaster with specified size in real site characterised by real vulnerabilities of followed assets, thatare rescheduled for certain time unit (usually 1 year) and certain territory unit. The principal attributes of each risk are uncertainty and vagueness, and therefore special approaches and methods must be used if we want to obtain qualified results forpractice. The paper compares three concepts of engineering disciplines based on risk management that have been used at present practice, i.e. the classical risk engineering, the security engineering and the safety engineering. It shows their common features and main disparities that lead to different level of safety of followed facility. It shows the results obtained by the systematic research of disasters and their risk on the basis of data from the Czech Republic.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
BC - Teorie a systémy řízení
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
R - Projekt Ramcoveho programu EK
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2011
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů