Comparison of Methods for the Safety Evaluation of UAS Operation

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21260%2F22%3A00362111" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21260/22:00362111 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.11.010" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.11.010</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.11.010" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.trpro.2022.11.010</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of Methods for the Safety Evaluation of UAS Operation

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The focus of this paper is to compare methods for safety evaluation of specific UAS operations. The UAS domain is constantly evolving and with this development comes new types of operation that have no analogy in the past. The core of UAS operation, like of the entire aviation industry, is achieving an acceptable level of safety, for which a specific operations risk assessment method, known by SORA, has been developed. SORA is a ten steps method designed for use by safety amateurs, which means that some generalization had to be done in its development. On the other hand, current state-of-the-art safety methods are systemic, which helps with the complexity of aviation operations these days. The goal of this paper is to compare SORA methodology with STPA and FRAM applied to specific complex UAS operations and to find safety gaps when applying SORA. The results identified system requirements that are not currently addressed and may have a negative impact on the safety of UAS operations.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of Methods for the Safety Evaluation of UAS Operation

Popis výsledku anglicky

The focus of this paper is to compare methods for safety evaluation of specific UAS operations. The UAS domain is constantly evolving and with this development comes new types of operation that have no analogy in the past. The core of UAS operation, like of the entire aviation industry, is achieving an acceptable level of safety, for which a specific operations risk assessment method, known by SORA, has been developed. SORA is a ten steps method designed for use by safety amateurs, which means that some generalization had to be done in its development. On the other hand, current state-of-the-art safety methods are systemic, which helps with the complexity of aviation operations these days. The goal of this paper is to compare SORA methodology with STPA and FRAM applied to specific complex UAS operations and to find safety gaps when applying SORA. The results identified system requirements that are not currently addressed and may have a negative impact on the safety of UAS operations.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

21100 - Other engineering and technologies

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Transportation Research Procedia

ISBN

—

ISSN

2352-1457

e-ISSN

2352-1465

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

78-85

Název nakladatele

Elsevier B.V.

Místo vydání

Amsterdam

Místo konání akce

Bratislava

Datum konání akce

9. 11. 2022

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—