Application of HTA in optometry
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F19%3A00321973" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/19:00321973 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9038-7_16" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9038-7_16</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9038-7_16" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-981-10-9038-7_16</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Application of HTA in optometry
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The main objective was to evaluate possible options for refractive error correction for three categories of clients (children from 6 years with light myopia, teenagers from 15 with astigmatism, adults with starting presbyopia) considering the available correction methods (glasses, contact lenses, refractive surgery). The evaluation was performed through data on the amount and frequency of orders in an optical shop and eye clinic. The data were gradually processed and the calculation of the cost of correction was performed from the perspective of a client. FMEA was done for individual methods of correction, and multiple-criteria evaluation applying the TOPSIS method was figured out. The TOPSIS method alone showed the glasses correction to be the best. The CEA, i.e. after considering the economic view, prioritized the contact lens correction. The best possible combination of correction methods for the refractive errors is, due to possible health risks, the combination of correction with glasses and contact lenses.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Application of HTA in optometry
Popis výsledku anglicky
The main objective was to evaluate possible options for refractive error correction for three categories of clients (children from 6 years with light myopia, teenagers from 15 with astigmatism, adults with starting presbyopia) considering the available correction methods (glasses, contact lenses, refractive surgery). The evaluation was performed through data on the amount and frequency of orders in an optical shop and eye clinic. The data were gradually processed and the calculation of the cost of correction was performed from the perspective of a client. FMEA was done for individual methods of correction, and multiple-criteria evaluation applying the TOPSIS method was figured out. The TOPSIS method alone showed the glasses correction to be the best. The CEA, i.e. after considering the economic view, prioritized the contact lens correction. The best possible combination of correction methods for the refractive errors is, due to possible health risks, the combination of correction with glasses and contact lenses.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20601 - Medical engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2018
ISBN
978-981-10-9038-7
ISSN
1680-0737
e-ISSN
1680-0737
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
87-93
Název nakladatele
Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
Místo vydání
—
Místo konání akce
Prague
Datum konání akce
3. 6. 2018
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000449742700016