The Analogy Between the Tradition Chinese Acupuncture and Phlebotomy in Medieval Bohemia
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F19%3A00340649" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/19:00340649 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jams.2019.05.001" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jams.2019.05.001</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jams.2019.05.001" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jams.2019.05.001</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Analogy Between the Tradition Chinese Acupuncture and Phlebotomy in Medieval Bohemia
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The common opinion is that in Europe acupuncture was introduced in China at the end of the XVII century. However there are some publications, which describe the similar treatment method in the Stone Age Europe. From ancient to late middle century theoretical and practical aspects of medieval medicine in Europe were very similar to the Tradition Chinese medicine. So it is possible that historical phlebotomy in Europe (bloodletting) played the same role as the acupuncture in the Chinese therapy and they had one scientific source. In this article we are comparing the modern acupuncture with some Bohemian medical tractates (Practica medicinalis by Sigismundus Albicus from 1408-1424, De sanguinis minucione by Cristannus de Prachaticz from 1430). We can see the close relationship between localizations and indications of medieval phlebotomy and modern acupuncture points. 40% of the bloodletting points have close localization with the modern acupuncture points and 57% of their indications are common or very similar. The similarity of two methods may be explained in two ways. First is a common scientific source and intensive interaction and crosscultural transmission of knowledge during medical development in China and Europe up to the beginning of the XV century. This possibility indicates also some linguistic coincidences. On the other hand, both methods could have been developed separately based on common clinical empire and objective neuro-physiological patterns of human body.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Analogy Between the Tradition Chinese Acupuncture and Phlebotomy in Medieval Bohemia
Popis výsledku anglicky
The common opinion is that in Europe acupuncture was introduced in China at the end of the XVII century. However there are some publications, which describe the similar treatment method in the Stone Age Europe. From ancient to late middle century theoretical and practical aspects of medieval medicine in Europe were very similar to the Tradition Chinese medicine. So it is possible that historical phlebotomy in Europe (bloodletting) played the same role as the acupuncture in the Chinese therapy and they had one scientific source. In this article we are comparing the modern acupuncture with some Bohemian medical tractates (Practica medicinalis by Sigismundus Albicus from 1408-1424, De sanguinis minucione by Cristannus de Prachaticz from 1430). We can see the close relationship between localizations and indications of medieval phlebotomy and modern acupuncture points. 40% of the bloodletting points have close localization with the modern acupuncture points and 57% of their indications are common or very similar. The similarity of two methods may be explained in two ways. First is a common scientific source and intensive interaction and crosscultural transmission of knowledge during medical development in China and Europe up to the beginning of the XV century. This possibility indicates also some linguistic coincidences. On the other hand, both methods could have been developed separately based on common clinical empire and objective neuro-physiological patterns of human body.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>ost</sub> - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30500 - Other medical sciences
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies
ISSN
2005-2901
e-ISSN
2093-8152
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
136-144
Kód UT WoS článku
000483354300005
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—