Determinants of reperfusion arrhythmias: action potential duration versus dispersion of repolarization

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F21%3A00356489" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/21:00356489 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.26402/jpp.2021.5.04" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.26402/jpp.2021.5.04</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.26402/jpp.2021.5.04" target="_blank" >10.26402/jpp.2021.5.04</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Determinants of reperfusion arrhythmias: action potential duration versus dispersion of repolarization

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The role of a border zone in arrhythmogenesis is not fully understood. In this study we evaluated independent contributions of action potential duration (APD) and dispersion of repolarization (DOR) across the normal/ischemic border to the development of ventricular tachycardia and/or fibrillation (VT/VF). Ischemia-reperfusion episodes were induced in anesthetized rats by transient coronary occlusion. Unipolar electrograms were recorded from ischemic and perfused areas using a 64-lead array to obtain activation times (ATs), repolarization times (RTs), activation-repolarization intervals (ARIs, a surrogate for APD) and dispersion of repolarization (DOR, as a difference between the earliest and latest RTs). Pinacidil (0.3 mg/kg) and glibenclamide (2 mg/kg) were applied to reduce DOR and to clamp APD at a lower and upper levels, respectively. In the control animals, APD shortened in the ischemic zone, DOR increased to 9 ± 3 ms, and VT/VF developed at reperfusion (6 out of 10). Pre-occlusion application of glibenclamide prolonged APD in the ischemic and perfused zones, decreased DOR to 5 ± 2 ms and did not affect VT/VF development (4 out of 11). Post-occlusion infusion of pinacidil shortened APD in the perfused zone, decreased DOR to 6 ± 3 ms and VT/VF incidence (2 out of 11). Extrasystolic burden at reperfusion was associated with VT/VF incidence in logistic regression analysis (β = 1.182, 95%CI 1.008 - 1.386, p = 0.04) and was lesser (p < 0.01) in the pinacidil group as compared to the control and glibenclamide groups. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the APDs in the perfused zone were a superior arrhythmogenic factor in respect to DOR in the present ischemia-reperfusion model.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Determinants of reperfusion arrhythmias: action potential duration versus dispersion of repolarization

Popis výsledku anglicky

The role of a border zone in arrhythmogenesis is not fully understood. In this study we evaluated independent contributions of action potential duration (APD) and dispersion of repolarization (DOR) across the normal/ischemic border to the development of ventricular tachycardia and/or fibrillation (VT/VF). Ischemia-reperfusion episodes were induced in anesthetized rats by transient coronary occlusion. Unipolar electrograms were recorded from ischemic and perfused areas using a 64-lead array to obtain activation times (ATs), repolarization times (RTs), activation-repolarization intervals (ARIs, a surrogate for APD) and dispersion of repolarization (DOR, as a difference between the earliest and latest RTs). Pinacidil (0.3 mg/kg) and glibenclamide (2 mg/kg) were applied to reduce DOR and to clamp APD at a lower and upper levels, respectively. In the control animals, APD shortened in the ischemic zone, DOR increased to 9 ± 3 ms, and VT/VF developed at reperfusion (6 out of 10). Pre-occlusion application of glibenclamide prolonged APD in the ischemic and perfused zones, decreased DOR to 5 ± 2 ms and did not affect VT/VF development (4 out of 11). Post-occlusion infusion of pinacidil shortened APD in the perfused zone, decreased DOR to 6 ± 3 ms and VT/VF incidence (2 out of 11). Extrasystolic burden at reperfusion was associated with VT/VF incidence in logistic regression analysis (β = 1.182, 95%CI 1.008 - 1.386, p = 0.04) and was lesser (p < 0.01) in the pinacidil group as compared to the control and glibenclamide groups. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the APDs in the perfused zone were a superior arrhythmogenic factor in respect to DOR in the present ischemia-reperfusion model.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30109 - Pathology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of physiology and pharmacology

ISSN

0867-5910

e-ISSN

1899-1505

Svazek periodika

72

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

7

Strana od-do

691-697

Kód UT WoS článku

000778373000007

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85124608557