Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Discrete event simulation model for cost-effectiveness evaluation of screening for asymptomatic patients with lower extremity arterial disease

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21460%2F22%3A00358558" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21460/22:00358558 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811792" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811792</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811792" target="_blank" >10.3390/ijerph191811792</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Discrete event simulation model for cost-effectiveness evaluation of screening for asymptomatic patients with lower extremity arterial disease

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Lower limb ischemic disease (LEAD) affects a significant portion of the population, with most patients being asympto-matic. Patient screening is necessary because LEAD patients have an increased risk of occurrence other cardiovascular events and manifestations of disease in terms of leg symptoms such as intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia or amputation. The aim of this work is to evaluate cost-effectiveness of screening using ABI diagnostics in asymptomatic patients and its impact on limb symptoms associated with LEAD. Discrete event simulation model was created for capturing lifetime costs and effects. Costs were calculated from the perspective of the health care payer and the effects were calculated as QALYs. The cost-effectiveness analysis was calculated to compare the ABI screening examination and the situation without such screening. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were calculated to evaluate the robustness of the results. In the basic setting, the screening intervention was a more expensive intervention at a cost of CZK 174,010, compared to CZK 70,177 for the strategy without screening. The benefits of screening were es-timated at 14.73 QALYs, and 14.46 QALYs without screening. The final ICER value of CZK 389,738 per QALY is below the willingness to pay threshold. The results of the simulated cost-effectiveness analysis suggest that screening using the ABI method is a cost-effective strategy. Likewise, the results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and of the scenario analysis are below the threshold of willingness to pay, thus confirming the robustness of the results.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Discrete event simulation model for cost-effectiveness evaluation of screening for asymptomatic patients with lower extremity arterial disease

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Lower limb ischemic disease (LEAD) affects a significant portion of the population, with most patients being asympto-matic. Patient screening is necessary because LEAD patients have an increased risk of occurrence other cardiovascular events and manifestations of disease in terms of leg symptoms such as intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia or amputation. The aim of this work is to evaluate cost-effectiveness of screening using ABI diagnostics in asymptomatic patients and its impact on limb symptoms associated with LEAD. Discrete event simulation model was created for capturing lifetime costs and effects. Costs were calculated from the perspective of the health care payer and the effects were calculated as QALYs. The cost-effectiveness analysis was calculated to compare the ABI screening examination and the situation without such screening. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were calculated to evaluate the robustness of the results. In the basic setting, the screening intervention was a more expensive intervention at a cost of CZK 174,010, compared to CZK 70,177 for the strategy without screening. The benefits of screening were es-timated at 14.73 QALYs, and 14.46 QALYs without screening. The final ICER value of CZK 389,738 per QALY is below the willingness to pay threshold. The results of the simulated cost-effectiveness analysis suggest that screening using the ABI method is a cost-effective strategy. Likewise, the results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and of the scenario analysis are below the threshold of willingness to pay, thus confirming the robustness of the results.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    50602 - Public administration

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

  • ISSN

    1661-7827

  • e-ISSN

    1660-4601

  • Svazek periodika

    19

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    18

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    CH - Švýcarská konfederace

  • Počet stran výsledku

    16

  • Strana od-do

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000858252500001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85138688463