A practical guide on the quantification of value of information gained by structural health monitoring and application to historic masonry structures

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21610%2F22%3A00348477" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21610/22:00348477 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1857793" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1857793</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1857793" target="_blank" >10.1080/15732479.2020.1857793</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A practical guide on the quantification of value of information gained by structural health monitoring and application to historic masonry structures

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Structural health monitoring (SHM) projects are mostly based on semi-empirical decisions, emphasising the importance of the structure and lacking a rational comparison of the benefits and costs. The present work offers guidance to overcome this, based on an objective framework using the quantification of the value of SHM in an engineering context. Firstly, procedures for practising engineers are outlined on the basis of the COST guidelines. Secondly, a case study, focused on the reliability of a historic masonry structure, demonstrates the optimisation of surveys based on non-destructive tests calibrated by destructive tests. Both the outlined procedures and case study are carefully prepared and in tune, so the reader can easily understand the feasibility of the framework. Decisions on the utilisation of SHM in practical applications can be effectively achieved based on the highest expected utility gained by SHM. For this, two scenarios are needed: (i) a scenario with at least one SHM strategy and (ii) a scenario without any SHM.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A practical guide on the quantification of value of information gained by structural health monitoring and application to historic masonry structures

Popis výsledku anglicky

Structural health monitoring (SHM) projects are mostly based on semi-empirical decisions, emphasising the importance of the structure and lacking a rational comparison of the benefits and costs. The present work offers guidance to overcome this, based on an objective framework using the quantification of the value of SHM in an engineering context. Firstly, procedures for practising engineers are outlined on the basis of the COST guidelines. Secondly, a case study, focused on the reliability of a historic masonry structure, demonstrates the optimisation of surveys based on non-destructive tests calibrated by destructive tests. Both the outlined procedures and case study are carefully prepared and in tune, so the reader can easily understand the feasibility of the framework. Decisions on the utilisation of SHM in practical applications can be effectively achieved based on the highest expected utility gained by SHM. For this, two scenarios are needed: (i) a scenario with at least one SHM strategy and (ii) a scenario without any SHM.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20102 - Construction engineering, Municipal and structural engineering

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LTT18003" target="_blank" >LTT18003: Pravděpodobnostní rozbor degradujících konstrukčních systémů</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Structure and Infrastructure Engineering

ISSN

1573-2479

e-ISSN

1744-8980

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

441-455

Kód UT WoS článku

000603866600001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85098530456