Suitability of Mechanics-Based and Optimized Machine Learning-Based Models in the Shear Strength Prediction of Slender Beams Without Stirrups

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21610%2F24%3A00378598" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21610/24:00378598 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123946" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123946</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings14123946" target="_blank" >10.3390/buildings14123946</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Suitability of Mechanics-Based and Optimized Machine Learning-Based Models in the Shear Strength Prediction of Slender Beams Without Stirrups

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Accurate shear capacity estimation for reinforced concrete (RC) beams without stirrups is essential for reliable structural design. Traditional code-based methods, primarily empirical, exhibit variability in predicting shear strength for these beams. This paper assesses the effectiveness of mechanics-based and optimized machine learning (ML) models for predicting shear strength in stirrup-less, slender beams using a dataset of 784 tests. Seven ML models—artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), AdaBoost, gradient boosting (GBR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)—were compared against three mechanics-based models: the Tran’s NLT Model (2020), the Multi-Action Shear Model (MASM), and the Compression Chord Capacity Model (CCC). Among the ML models, XGB and GBR demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, with coefficients of determination (R(2)) of 0.974 and 0.966, respectively, indicating strong correlation with experimental data. Performance metrics such as mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) showed that XGB and GBR consistently outperformed other models, yielding lower error margins. Statistical analysis revealed minimal bias and variability in the predictions of XGB and GBR, with a coefficient of variation (CoV) of 14%, ensuring high reliability. The NLT model, the most accurate of the mechanical-based models, achieved a mean of 1.02 and a CoV of 16% for its model error, demonstrating reasonable prediction reliability but falling behind XGB and GBR in accuracy. With Shapley additive explanations (SHAPs), the beam width and depth were identified as primary predictors of shear strength, providing critical insights for enhancing design and construction practises.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Suitability of Mechanics-Based and Optimized Machine Learning-Based Models in the Shear Strength Prediction of Slender Beams Without Stirrups

Popis výsledku anglicky

Accurate shear capacity estimation for reinforced concrete (RC) beams without stirrups is essential for reliable structural design. Traditional code-based methods, primarily empirical, exhibit variability in predicting shear strength for these beams. This paper assesses the effectiveness of mechanics-based and optimized machine learning (ML) models for predicting shear strength in stirrup-less, slender beams using a dataset of 784 tests. Seven ML models—artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), AdaBoost, gradient boosting (GBR), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)—were compared against three mechanics-based models: the Tran’s NLT Model (2020), the Multi-Action Shear Model (MASM), and the Compression Chord Capacity Model (CCC). Among the ML models, XGB and GBR demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy, with coefficients of determination (R(2)) of 0.974 and 0.966, respectively, indicating strong correlation with experimental data. Performance metrics such as mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE) showed that XGB and GBR consistently outperformed other models, yielding lower error margins. Statistical analysis revealed minimal bias and variability in the predictions of XGB and GBR, with a coefficient of variation (CoV) of 14%, ensuring high reliability. The NLT model, the most accurate of the mechanical-based models, achieved a mean of 1.02 and a CoV of 16% for its model error, demonstrating reasonable prediction reliability but falling behind XGB and GBR in accuracy. With Shapley additive explanations (SHAPs), the beam width and depth were identified as primary predictors of shear strength, providing critical insights for enhancing design and construction practises.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20102 - Construction engineering, Municipal and structural engineering

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA24-10892S" target="_blank" >GA24-10892S: Strojové učení pro víceúrovňové modelování prostorové variability a trhlin pro zajištění udržitelnosti betonových konstrukcí</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Buildings

ISSN

2075-5309

e-ISSN

2075-5309

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

12

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

33

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

001386772800001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85213245635