Reframing planning theory in terms of five categories of questions

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21630%2F16%3A00301597" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21630/16:00301597 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095214525392" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095214525392</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095214525392" target="_blank" >10.1177/1473095214525392</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Reframing planning theory in terms of five categories of questions

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article investigates how planning is influenced by five categories of questions (what, who, when/where, how and why) and the interactions between them. Planning theories differ in their answers to these questions, but all of them are primarily built around an assumed connection between the questions of `what’ and `how’. This orthodox assumption of a `what–how’ connection is shown to be responsible for the failure of planning theories in practice and their inability to address issues of power. The article illustrates that both ends and means (`what’ and `how’) are predefined by answers to three fundamental questions (`who’, `when/where’ and `why’) and that there is no direct connection between `what’ and `how’ in practice.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Reframing planning theory in terms of five categories of questions

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article investigates how planning is influenced by five categories of questions (what, who, when/where, how and why) and the interactions between them. Planning theories differ in their answers to these questions, but all of them are primarily built around an assumed connection between the questions of `what’ and `how’. This orthodox assumption of a `what–how’ connection is shown to be responsible for the failure of planning theories in practice and their inability to address issues of power. The article illustrates that both ends and means (`what’ and `how’) are predefined by answers to three fundamental questions (`who’, `when/where’ and `why’) and that there is no direct connection between `what’ and `how’ in practice.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AE - Řízení, správa a administrativa

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Planning Theory

ISSN

1473-0952

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

15

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

145-161

Kód UT WoS článku

000374789000003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—