Assessing Outsourced Distribution Channels
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21630%2F18%3A00323173" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21630/18:00323173 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.267" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.267</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.267" target="_blank" >10.5709/ce.1897-9254.267</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Assessing Outsourced Distribution Channels
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
We respond to recent failed initiatives of the Czech banking market to develop business models for the sale of retail deposit products, based on third-party distribution channels. We argue that the issue is the application of inappropriate capital budgeting methods. While static cost-benefit analysis seems to be generally appropriate for conventional banking projects based on branching or internet, they provide grossly misleading estimates of commissioning expenses, which can lead to completely unrealistic project assessments and poorly designed commission schedules. Alternatively, we derive a dynamic model based on statistical simulation (Monte Carlo) and using a real-life case study to illustrate the impacts of particular value drivers on commissioning costs. Our analysis shows that conventional and simulation-based budgeting generates inverse cost functions over time, and the difference becomes operationally tangible in the second and third year of the project, which is commensurate with the apparent timing of the bank’s business strategy revisions. To fulfill the goal of this paper, we demonstrate that statistical simulation is an expedient tool for managerial support and capital budgeting in cases where value drivers are impacted by non-linear dynamic processes.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Assessing Outsourced Distribution Channels
Popis výsledku anglicky
We respond to recent failed initiatives of the Czech banking market to develop business models for the sale of retail deposit products, based on third-party distribution channels. We argue that the issue is the application of inappropriate capital budgeting methods. While static cost-benefit analysis seems to be generally appropriate for conventional banking projects based on branching or internet, they provide grossly misleading estimates of commissioning expenses, which can lead to completely unrealistic project assessments and poorly designed commission schedules. Alternatively, we derive a dynamic model based on statistical simulation (Monte Carlo) and using a real-life case study to illustrate the impacts of particular value drivers on commissioning costs. Our analysis shows that conventional and simulation-based budgeting generates inverse cost functions over time, and the difference becomes operationally tangible in the second and third year of the project, which is commensurate with the apparent timing of the bank’s business strategy revisions. To fulfill the goal of this paper, we demonstrate that statistical simulation is an expedient tool for managerial support and capital budgeting in cases where value drivers are impacted by non-linear dynamic processes.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50206 - Finance
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Contemporary Economics
ISSN
2084-0845
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
12
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
PL - Polská republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
129-138
Kód UT WoS článku
000437546500001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85049436546