MICA REGULATION UNDER SCRUTINY
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21630%2F24%3A00374596" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21630/24:00374596 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://tlq.ilaw.cas.cz/index.php/tlq/article/view/584" target="_blank" >https://tlq.ilaw.cas.cz/index.php/tlq/article/view/584</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
MICA REGULATION UNDER SCRUTINY
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The Markets in Crypto-assets Regulation (MiCA) seeks to regulate crypto-asset services and cryptoasset service providers within the European Union as an area, which was mainly built on the idea of independence from the current “traditional” financial system and its regulatory framework. MiCA, inspired by the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) as a cornerstone of the EU financial services regulation, now aims to change the paradigm. The paper focuses on examining the scope of the relevant crypto-asset services compared with the investment services catalogue under MiFID II. By analysing the definitions and content of individual services, it seeks to identify possible differences and frictions. Further, it categorises and evaluates prospective requirements put on the crypto-asset service providers (CASPs). As a result, the paper emphasizes the relevant differences of MiCA and MiFID II lists, as well as provides an overview of the new requirements put on cryptoasset service providers.
Název v anglickém jazyce
MICA REGULATION UNDER SCRUTINY
Popis výsledku anglicky
The Markets in Crypto-assets Regulation (MiCA) seeks to regulate crypto-asset services and cryptoasset service providers within the European Union as an area, which was mainly built on the idea of independence from the current “traditional” financial system and its regulatory framework. MiCA, inspired by the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) as a cornerstone of the EU financial services regulation, now aims to change the paradigm. The paper focuses on examining the scope of the relevant crypto-asset services compared with the investment services catalogue under MiFID II. By analysing the definitions and content of individual services, it seeks to identify possible differences and frictions. Further, it categorises and evaluates prospective requirements put on the crypto-asset service providers (CASPs). As a result, the paper emphasizes the relevant differences of MiCA and MiFID II lists, as well as provides an overview of the new requirements put on cryptoasset service providers.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50501 - Law
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
The Lawyer Quarterly
ISSN
1805-8396
e-ISSN
1805-840X
Svazek periodika
14
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
91-100
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85188747022