Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Telemetric monitoring of physiological functions to reduce health risk in wearing PPE: Invasive vs. non-invasive measurement

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70565813%3A_____%2F22%3AN0000036" target="_blank" >RIV/70565813:_____/22:N0000036 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Telemetric monitoring of physiological functions to reduce health risk in wearing PPE: Invasive vs. non-invasive measurement

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Personal protective equipment (PPE) is necessary body protection of first responders working in conditions of high CBRN threat. Nevertheless, the PPE usage is connected to changes in normal heat exchange between the human body and the surrounding environment. PPE creates a barrier between the body and the hazardous environment, but at same time it hampers typical heat dissipation of human body and this way creating the risk of thermal strain during the work in PPE. This strain can influence cognitive functions and lead to heat exhaustion and harmful health consequences. Thus, it is important to monitor physiological parameters such as heart frequency and the core body temperature of persons working in PPE to prevent such risk situations. In our research, we compared two different telemetric systems for monitoring physiological functions – the FlexiGuard system developed by FBMI of the Czech Technical University in Prague, and the CORE system developed by greenTEG, Zurich, Switzerland. The FlexiGuard system uses a rectal cable probe for measuring the core body temperature while the CORE system employs an indirect measurement by a novel heat flux sensor. The comparison revealed that the FlexiGuard system provided more precise values of the core body temperature across all physical activity regimes, while the CORE system delivered biased values during specific transient conditions when the high activity mode of the monitored person changed to the rest mode. However, from the wearers’ point of view, the CORE system is more comfortable and ethically acceptable than the FlexiGuard.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Telemetric monitoring of physiological functions to reduce health risk in wearing PPE: Invasive vs. non-invasive measurement

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Personal protective equipment (PPE) is necessary body protection of first responders working in conditions of high CBRN threat. Nevertheless, the PPE usage is connected to changes in normal heat exchange between the human body and the surrounding environment. PPE creates a barrier between the body and the hazardous environment, but at same time it hampers typical heat dissipation of human body and this way creating the risk of thermal strain during the work in PPE. This strain can influence cognitive functions and lead to heat exhaustion and harmful health consequences. Thus, it is important to monitor physiological parameters such as heart frequency and the core body temperature of persons working in PPE to prevent such risk situations. In our research, we compared two different telemetric systems for monitoring physiological functions – the FlexiGuard system developed by FBMI of the Czech Technical University in Prague, and the CORE system developed by greenTEG, Zurich, Switzerland. The FlexiGuard system uses a rectal cable probe for measuring the core body temperature while the CORE system employs an indirect measurement by a novel heat flux sensor. The comparison revealed that the FlexiGuard system provided more precise values of the core body temperature across all physical activity regimes, while the CORE system delivered biased values during specific transient conditions when the high activity mode of the monitored person changed to the rest mode. However, from the wearers’ point of view, the CORE system is more comfortable and ethically acceptable than the FlexiGuard.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    O - Ostatní výsledky

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30305 - Occupational health

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/TM01000017" target="_blank" >TM01000017: Vývoj filtrační a ventilačně ochlazovací jednotky pro ochranné oděvy (APVECU)</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů