Metrological comparison between heterogeneous surfaces and their imprints
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28110%2F22%3A63555358" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28110/22:63555358 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://journalmt.com/artkey/mft-202204-0001_metrological-comparison-between-heterogeneous-surfaces-and-their-imprints.php" target="_blank" >http://journalmt.com/artkey/mft-202204-0001_metrological-comparison-between-heterogeneous-surfaces-and-their-imprints.php</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Metrological comparison between heterogeneous surfaces and their imprints
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article seeks to compare the roughness characteristics of surfaces created through unconventional machining technologies, specifically utilizing plasma and laser. Cuts of different thicknesses of material were taken for this purpose. Furthermore, the article presents an evaluation of surfaces obtained from an impression material SILOFLEX (R), followed by the determination of similarities between these impressions and original surfaces. In this work, we mainly aimed to statistically find and determine the differences between the evaluation of surfaces in accordance with ISO 4287, ISO 4288, and ISO 25 178. Next, investigation analysis of the machined and replicated surfaces was done utilizing the contactless profilometer and the follow-up statistical evaluation of measured data from compared surface groups.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Metrological comparison between heterogeneous surfaces and their imprints
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article seeks to compare the roughness characteristics of surfaces created through unconventional machining technologies, specifically utilizing plasma and laser. Cuts of different thicknesses of material were taken for this purpose. Furthermore, the article presents an evaluation of surfaces obtained from an impression material SILOFLEX (R), followed by the determination of similarities between these impressions and original surfaces. In this work, we mainly aimed to statistically find and determine the differences between the evaluation of surfaces in accordance with ISO 4287, ISO 4288, and ISO 25 178. Next, investigation analysis of the machined and replicated surfaces was done utilizing the contactless profilometer and the follow-up statistical evaluation of measured data from compared surface groups.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20501 - Materials engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Manufacturing Technology
ISSN
1213-2489
e-ISSN
2787-9402
Svazek periodika
22
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
429-435
Kód UT WoS článku
000869919600006
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85141307452