Economic policy uncertainty and renewable energy transition: Assessing the impact of resource richness, environmental technology, and environmental governance
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28120%2F25%3A63587718" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28120/25:63587718 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125003325?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148125003325?via%3Dihub</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.122670" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.renene.2025.122670</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Economic policy uncertainty and renewable energy transition: Assessing the impact of resource richness, environmental technology, and environmental governance
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The urgency of transitioning to renewable energy is a core priority under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, economic policy uncertainty (EPU) remains a significant challenge in achieving a stable and sustained renewable energy transition (RET), particularly in resource-rich regions such as the Arctic Council countries (Sweden, the United States, Finland, Norway, Canada, Russia, and Denmark). Despite the wealth of literature on RET, research on the Arctic region remains scarce, particularly regarding the interplay between EPU, resource abundance, environmental technology, and governance. This research fills the gap by examining the impact of these factors on RET in the Arctic from 1990 to 2020, employing the Method of moment quantile regression (MMQR) approach to capture heterogeneous effects across different quantiles of RET distribution. The empirical findings reveal that a 1 % rise in economic policy uncertainty leads to a decline in RET between 0.287 % and 0.557 % across different quartiles, indicating a robust negative impact. Conversely, a 1 % increase in natural resource endowment (0.108 %–0.402 %), environmental technology (0.408 %–0.810 %), and environmental governance (0.216 %–0.633 %) enhances RET, with varying degrees of intensity across RETdistributions. Additionally, the robustness analysis, conducted through DOLS and FMOLS, reaffirms the inverse and strong dynamics between economic policy uncertainty and RET, underscoring that policy instability disproportionately affects lower quantiles of RET. The policy implications are threefold. First, Arctic nations must implement stabilized and predictable economic policies to mitigate uncertainty, as fluctuations in economic policy hinder investment in renewable infrastructure. Second, policies should prioritize resource allocation towards clean energy development, ensuring that natural resource wealth is not solely invested into conventional energy sectors but redirected to facilitate RET. Lastly, enhancing environmental technology and governance frameworks through targeted investments and regulatory incentives will further accelerate the transition toward clean energy.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Economic policy uncertainty and renewable energy transition: Assessing the impact of resource richness, environmental technology, and environmental governance
Popis výsledku anglicky
The urgency of transitioning to renewable energy is a core priority under the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). However, economic policy uncertainty (EPU) remains a significant challenge in achieving a stable and sustained renewable energy transition (RET), particularly in resource-rich regions such as the Arctic Council countries (Sweden, the United States, Finland, Norway, Canada, Russia, and Denmark). Despite the wealth of literature on RET, research on the Arctic region remains scarce, particularly regarding the interplay between EPU, resource abundance, environmental technology, and governance. This research fills the gap by examining the impact of these factors on RET in the Arctic from 1990 to 2020, employing the Method of moment quantile regression (MMQR) approach to capture heterogeneous effects across different quantiles of RET distribution. The empirical findings reveal that a 1 % rise in economic policy uncertainty leads to a decline in RET between 0.287 % and 0.557 % across different quartiles, indicating a robust negative impact. Conversely, a 1 % increase in natural resource endowment (0.108 %–0.402 %), environmental technology (0.408 %–0.810 %), and environmental governance (0.216 %–0.633 %) enhances RET, with varying degrees of intensity across RETdistributions. Additionally, the robustness analysis, conducted through DOLS and FMOLS, reaffirms the inverse and strong dynamics between economic policy uncertainty and RET, underscoring that policy instability disproportionately affects lower quantiles of RET. The policy implications are threefold. First, Arctic nations must implement stabilized and predictable economic policies to mitigate uncertainty, as fluctuations in economic policy hinder investment in renewable infrastructure. Second, policies should prioritize resource allocation towards clean energy development, ensuring that natural resource wealth is not solely invested into conventional energy sectors but redirected to facilitate RET. Lastly, enhancing environmental technology and governance frameworks through targeted investments and regulatory incentives will further accelerate the transition toward clean energy.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50201 - Economic Theory
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Renewable Energy
ISSN
0960-1481
e-ISSN
1879-0682
Svazek periodika
2025
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
224
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
15
Strana od-do
1-15
Kód UT WoS článku
001435328700001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85218167627