A Star-Shaped Crossroad: From (Counterfactual) Historiography to Historiographic Metafiction

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F15%3A43873196" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/15:43873196 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://conference.uaa.utb.cz/tp2013/FromTheoryToPractice2013.pdf#page=201" target="_blank" >http://conference.uaa.utb.cz/tp2013/FromTheoryToPractice2013.pdf#page=201</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A Star-Shaped Crossroad: From (Counterfactual) Historiography to Historiographic Metafiction

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the 1970s, Hayden White stirred a heated debate about similarities between historiography and fiction. In his monographs Metahistory (1973) and Tropics of Discourse (1978), he developed a theory that from the discourse perspective, the process of writing a historiographic text and writing fiction is no different as they use the same strategies. Lubomír Doležel, in his Possible Worlds of Fiction and History: Postmodern Stage (2010), reacts to this theory and takes the argument further, claiming that the comparison of historiography and fiction has reached a dead end and needs to be researched from a new perspective - that of the possible worlds theory. The debate between White's and Doležel's theories re-establishes the borderline between historiography and fiction but does not provide a fully satisfying answer when it comes to distinguishing between historiography and specific genres of fiction, such as historiographic fiction. Problems also arise when using the possible worlds theo

Název v anglickém jazyce

A Star-Shaped Crossroad: From (Counterfactual) Historiography to Historiographic Metafiction

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the 1970s, Hayden White stirred a heated debate about similarities between historiography and fiction. In his monographs Metahistory (1973) and Tropics of Discourse (1978), he developed a theory that from the discourse perspective, the process of writing a historiographic text and writing fiction is no different as they use the same strategies. Lubomír Doležel, in his Possible Worlds of Fiction and History: Postmodern Stage (2010), reacts to this theory and takes the argument further, claiming that the comparison of historiography and fiction has reached a dead end and needs to be researched from a new perspective - that of the possible worlds theory. The debate between White's and Doležel's theories re-establishes the borderline between historiography and fiction but does not provide a fully satisfying answer when it comes to distinguishing between historiography and specific genres of fiction, such as historiographic fiction. Problems also arise when using the possible worlds theo

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AJ - Písemnictví, mas–media, audiovize

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

From Theory to Practice 2013: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Anglophone Studies

ISBN

978-80-7454-450-7

ISSN

1805-9899

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

201-212

Název nakladatele

Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně

Místo vydání

Zlín

Místo konání akce

Zlín

Datum konání akce

5. 9. 2013

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

WRD - Celosvětová akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—