Latest developments in minimally invasive spinal treatment in Slovakia and its comparison with an open approach for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28150%2F23%3A63566098" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28150/23:63566098 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144755" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144755</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144755" target="_blank" >10.3390/jcm12144755</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Latest developments in minimally invasive spinal treatment in Slovakia and its comparison with an open approach for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The study describes the benefits of MIS-TLIF (minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) and compares them with OTLIF (open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion). It compares blood loss, length of hospitalization stays (LOS), operation time, and return of the patient to the environment. A total of 250 adults (109 males and 141 females), mean age 59.5 &amp; PLUSMN; 12.6, who underwent MIS-TLIF in the Neurosurgery Clinic (NSC) Ruzomberok, Slovakia, because of lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD), participated in this retrospective study. Data were obtained from the patients&apos; medical records and from the standardized Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) index questionnaire. To compare ODI in our study sample, we used the Student&apos;s Paired Sample Test. To compare the MIS-TLIF and OTLIF approaches, a meta-analysis was conducted. Confidence intervals were 95% CI. The test of homogeneity (Chi-square (Q)) and the degree of heterogeneity (I-2 test) among the included studies were used. Statistical analyses were two-sided (&amp; alpha; = 0.05). All monitored parameters were significantly better in MIS-TLIF group: blood loss (p &lt; 0.001), operation time (p &lt; 0.001), and ODI changes (p &lt; 0.001). LOS (p &lt; 0.042) were close to the significance level. ODI in the study sample decreased by 33.44% points after MIS-TLIF, and it significantly increased as well (p &lt; 0.001). The percentage of patients who were satisfied with the surgery they underwent was 84.8%. The study confirmed that the MIS-TLIF method is in general gentler for the patient and allows the faster regeneration of patient&apos;s health status compared to OTLIF.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Latest developments in minimally invasive spinal treatment in Slovakia and its comparison with an open approach for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases

Popis výsledku anglicky

The study describes the benefits of MIS-TLIF (minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion) and compares them with OTLIF (open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion). It compares blood loss, length of hospitalization stays (LOS), operation time, and return of the patient to the environment. A total of 250 adults (109 males and 141 females), mean age 59.5 &amp; PLUSMN; 12.6, who underwent MIS-TLIF in the Neurosurgery Clinic (NSC) Ruzomberok, Slovakia, because of lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD), participated in this retrospective study. Data were obtained from the patients&apos; medical records and from the standardized Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) index questionnaire. To compare ODI in our study sample, we used the Student&apos;s Paired Sample Test. To compare the MIS-TLIF and OTLIF approaches, a meta-analysis was conducted. Confidence intervals were 95% CI. The test of homogeneity (Chi-square (Q)) and the degree of heterogeneity (I-2 test) among the included studies were used. Statistical analyses were two-sided (&amp; alpha; = 0.05). All monitored parameters were significantly better in MIS-TLIF group: blood loss (p &lt; 0.001), operation time (p &lt; 0.001), and ODI changes (p &lt; 0.001). LOS (p &lt; 0.042) were close to the significance level. ODI in the study sample decreased by 33.44% points after MIS-TLIF, and it significantly increased as well (p &lt; 0.001). The percentage of patients who were satisfied with the surgery they underwent was 84.8%. The study confirmed that the MIS-TLIF method is in general gentler for the patient and allows the faster regeneration of patient&apos;s health status compared to OTLIF.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30218 - General and internal medicine

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Clinical Medicine

ISSN

2077-0383

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

12

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

14

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

001035875900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85166348932