Surface adhesion between ceramic injection molding feedstocks and processing tools
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F70883521%3A28610%2F16%3A43874444" target="_blank" >RIV/70883521:28610/16:43874444 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.132" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.132</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.132" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.132</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Surface adhesion between ceramic injection molding feedstocks and processing tools
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Interfacial adhesion between highly filled aluminum and zirconium oxides ceramic compounds and CIM (Ceramic Injection Molding) processing tools was investigated from contact angle measurement. Polymers considered as binder components were low density polyethylene, paraffin wax, polyethylene glycol, camauba wax, acrawax, and stearic acid. Channel walls of the mold were constructed from hardened, TiN hardened, nitridized and heat-treated steels. From the calculated surface energies, the superiority of heat-treated steel as well as acrawax and especially polyethylene glycol as binders is derived. Carnauba wax shows similar wettability as stearic acid, thus becoming promising substitute for the role of processing aid. Concerning tested ceramic powders, Al2O3 revealed somewhat higher polar component of the surface energy than ZrO2. The differences in total surface energies of powders and binders are all about 3 J/m(2) lower (PEG) or higher (PW, LDPE, AW, CW, SA) for Al2O3 powder than for ZrO2.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Surface adhesion between ceramic injection molding feedstocks and processing tools
Popis výsledku anglicky
Interfacial adhesion between highly filled aluminum and zirconium oxides ceramic compounds and CIM (Ceramic Injection Molding) processing tools was investigated from contact angle measurement. Polymers considered as binder components were low density polyethylene, paraffin wax, polyethylene glycol, camauba wax, acrawax, and stearic acid. Channel walls of the mold were constructed from hardened, TiN hardened, nitridized and heat-treated steels. From the calculated surface energies, the superiority of heat-treated steel as well as acrawax and especially polyethylene glycol as binders is derived. Carnauba wax shows similar wettability as stearic acid, thus becoming promising substitute for the role of processing aid. Concerning tested ceramic powders, Al2O3 revealed somewhat higher polar component of the surface energy than ZrO2. The differences in total surface energies of powders and binders are all about 3 J/m(2) lower (PEG) or higher (PW, LDPE, AW, CW, SA) for Al2O3 powder than for ZrO2.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
JK - Koroze a povrchové úpravy materiálu
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LO1504" target="_blank" >LO1504: Centrum polymerních systémů plus</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)<br>I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Ceramics International
ISSN
0272-8842
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
42
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
460-465
Kód UT WoS článku
000365369500051
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—