Terminologia Anatomica after 17 years: Inconsistencies, mistakes and new proposals

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F71226401%3A_____%2F15%3A%231007134" target="_blank" >RIV/71226401:_____/15:#1007134 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11120/15:43909849

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2015.04.006" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2015.04.006</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2015.04.006" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.aanat.2015.04.006</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Terminologia Anatomica after 17 years: Inconsistencies, mistakes and new proposals

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The article deals with our experience of Terminologia Anatomica (TA) in fields of education (of systemic and topographic anatomy) and clinical medicine (teaching of clinical anatomy and courses for young physicians in endoscopy). The anatomical nomenclature in Latin has been official for 120 years and its latest version for 17 years. Its main weak points should be discussed in public (or at least the discussion should be provoked), which is the reason for publishing the following findings and ensuing proposals. They are classified with seven groups: mistakes in TA, discrepancies in TA, multiplication of terms, synonyms in TA, identical terms for different structures, too long terms and missing terms in TA. The last group comprises missing terms in systemic anatomy, clinical anatomy, a paucity of terms in variant anatomy, in locomotion system and in topographic anatomy. Several attempts to draw attention to these have been made by the publication of inaccuracies in Nomina Anatomica and

Název v anglickém jazyce

Terminologia Anatomica after 17 years: Inconsistencies, mistakes and new proposals

Popis výsledku anglicky

The article deals with our experience of Terminologia Anatomica (TA) in fields of education (of systemic and topographic anatomy) and clinical medicine (teaching of clinical anatomy and courses for young physicians in endoscopy). The anatomical nomenclature in Latin has been official for 120 years and its latest version for 17 years. Its main weak points should be discussed in public (or at least the discussion should be provoked), which is the reason for publishing the following findings and ensuing proposals. They are classified with seven groups: mistakes in TA, discrepancies in TA, multiplication of terms, synonyms in TA, identical terms for different structures, too long terms and missing terms in TA. The last group comprises missing terms in systemic anatomy, clinical anatomy, a paucity of terms in variant anatomy, in locomotion system and in topographic anatomy. Several attempts to draw attention to these have been made by the publication of inaccuracies in Nomina Anatomica and

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30106 - Anatomy and morphology (plant science to be 1.6)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Annals of Anatomy

ISSN

0940-9602

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

201

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

September

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

8-16

Kód UT WoS článku

000360867900002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84943772129