Comparison of methods used for evaluation of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of model chemicals - parabens

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F75010330%3A_____%2F20%3A00013464" target="_blank" >RIV/75010330:_____/20:00013464 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/60460709:41330/20:88249 RIV/61989592:15110/20:73606867

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/2020/69_S661.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/2020/69_S661.pdf</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.934615" target="_blank" >10.33549/physiolres.934615</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Comparison of methods used for evaluation of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of model chemicals - parabens

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Growing worldwide efforts to replace (reduce) animal testing and to improve alternative in vitro tests which may be more efficient in terms of both time, cost and scientific validity include also genotoxicity/mutagenicity endpoints. The aim of the review article was to summarize currently available in vitro testing approaches in this field, their regulatory acceptance and recommended combinations for classification of chemicals. A study using the combination of Comet Assay performed on two cell lines and the Chromosomal Aberration test on human peripheral lymphocytes was performed with the aim to predict the genotoxic potential of selected paraben esters, serving as a model chemical group. Parabens are widely used in consumer products as preservatives and have been reported to exhibit inconclusive results in numerous genotoxicity studies. The Comet Assay identified Ethylparaben and Benzylparaben as potentially genotoxic. The Chromosomal Aberration test revealed weak genotoxic potential in case of Ethylparaben and positive genotoxicity in case of Butylparaben, Propylparaben and Isopropylparaben. The main reasons for variability seem to be limited water solubility of parabens, determining their bioavailability at the cellular level, and absence of metabolic activation in the Comet Assay. The results confirmed that the Comet Assay should serve as a screening test and should not be used as a stand-alone method for classification of genotoxicity. The weight of evidence approach in risk assessment should be supported with data generated with the use of human relevant in vitro methods based on cells / tissues of human origin.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Comparison of methods used for evaluation of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of model chemicals - parabens

Popis výsledku anglicky

Growing worldwide efforts to replace (reduce) animal testing and to improve alternative in vitro tests which may be more efficient in terms of both time, cost and scientific validity include also genotoxicity/mutagenicity endpoints. The aim of the review article was to summarize currently available in vitro testing approaches in this field, their regulatory acceptance and recommended combinations for classification of chemicals. A study using the combination of Comet Assay performed on two cell lines and the Chromosomal Aberration test on human peripheral lymphocytes was performed with the aim to predict the genotoxic potential of selected paraben esters, serving as a model chemical group. Parabens are widely used in consumer products as preservatives and have been reported to exhibit inconclusive results in numerous genotoxicity studies. The Comet Assay identified Ethylparaben and Benzylparaben as potentially genotoxic. The Chromosomal Aberration test revealed weak genotoxic potential in case of Ethylparaben and positive genotoxicity in case of Butylparaben, Propylparaben and Isopropylparaben. The main reasons for variability seem to be limited water solubility of parabens, determining their bioavailability at the cellular level, and absence of metabolic activation in the Comet Assay. The results confirmed that the Comet Assay should serve as a screening test and should not be used as a stand-alone method for classification of genotoxicity. The weight of evidence approach in risk assessment should be supported with data generated with the use of human relevant in vitro methods based on cells / tissues of human origin.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30108 - Toxicology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EF16_019%2F000860" target="_blank" >EF16_019/000860: Mezinárodní konkurenceschopnost SZÚ ve výzkumu, vývoji a vzdělávání v alternativních toxikologických metodách.</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Physiological Research

ISSN

0862-8408

e-ISSN

1802-9973

Svazek periodika

69

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

Suppl. 4

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

„S661“-„S679“

Kód UT WoS článku

000621838200012

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85102229594