From Donbas Conflict to the Russian-Ukrainian War. A Review of Literature

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F75112779%3A_____%2F24%3A00011582" target="_blank" >RIV/75112779:_____/24:00011582 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://cjir.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/777/734" target="_blank" >https://cjir.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/777/734</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.32422/cjir.777" target="_blank" >10.32422/cjir.777</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

From Donbas Conflict to the Russian-Ukrainian War. A Review of Literature

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Using the conf lict studies literature, the article classifies the latest scholarly writings on the origins of the Donbas conf lict into three general groupings: on the role of the history and identity of the region’s inhabitants, on the interference by “third” actors and on so-called contentious politics. The analysis suggests that the initial support of the uprising by Russia is usually greatly overestimated, and the level of social discontent and protest movements is underestimated. The study of contentious politics appears to be the most appropriate tool regarding the origins of the conf lict. After 2015, the conf lict took on, at least in part, the contours of an interstate clash, but the Donbas insurgency has continued to retain its authenticity. The failure of the 2015 settlement and the path to war after 2018 cannot be understood without considering the actions of Russia and those of Ukraine and leading Western states.

Název v anglickém jazyce

From Donbas Conflict to the Russian-Ukrainian War. A Review of Literature

Popis výsledku anglicky

Using the conf lict studies literature, the article classifies the latest scholarly writings on the origins of the Donbas conf lict into three general groupings: on the role of the history and identity of the region’s inhabitants, on the interference by “third” actors and on so-called contentious politics. The analysis suggests that the initial support of the uprising by Russia is usually greatly overestimated, and the level of social discontent and protest movements is underestimated. The study of contentious politics appears to be the most appropriate tool regarding the origins of the conf lict. After 2015, the conf lict took on, at least in part, the contours of an interstate clash, but the Donbas insurgency has continued to retain its authenticity. The failure of the 2015 settlement and the path to war after 2018 cannot be understood without considering the actions of Russia and those of Ukraine and leading Western states.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60101 - History (history of science and technology to be 6.3, history of specific sciences to be under the respective headings)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Czech Journal of International Relations

ISSN

2788-2985

e-ISSN

2788-2993

Svazek periodika

58

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

41-66

Kód UT WoS článku

001130649200008

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85179301231