Continuous radon-in-water monitoring – comparison of methods under laboratory conditions and results of in situ measurements
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652052%3A_____%2F19%3AN0000031" target="_blank" >RIV/86652052:_____/19:N0000031 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68407700:21340/19:00356493
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article/186/2-3/406/5674027" target="_blank" >https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article/186/2-3/406/5674027</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncz241" target="_blank" >10.1093/rpd/ncz241</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Continuous radon-in-water monitoring – comparison of methods under laboratory conditions and results of in situ measurements
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The extraction of dissolved radon from water to gas in the most common way to measure radon concentration in water continuously. The response delay of continuous radon-in-water detection system (continuous monitor + equilibrator) is influenced by the response time of the continuous monitor and a rate of an establishment of equilibrium in the equilibrator (exchanger unit). Two types of equilibrators were used in performed experiments to compare the response time of various detection systems - RAD AQUA that uses water spraying and equilibrator with ACCUREL® PP membrane that enables radon diffusion. Each of these was connected to the continuous monitor RAD7 or RM-3. The response delay after turning on the water flow through the equilibrator was determined. The fastest detection system was RAD7 + RAD AQUA that was subsequently tested during the in-situ measurement of thermal water in the healing spa and water sources near Cheb and České Budějovice.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Continuous radon-in-water monitoring – comparison of methods under laboratory conditions and results of in situ measurements
Popis výsledku anglicky
The extraction of dissolved radon from water to gas in the most common way to measure radon concentration in water continuously. The response delay of continuous radon-in-water detection system (continuous monitor + equilibrator) is influenced by the response time of the continuous monitor and a rate of an establishment of equilibrium in the equilibrator (exchanger unit). Two types of equilibrators were used in performed experiments to compare the response time of various detection systems - RAD AQUA that uses water spraying and equilibrator with ACCUREL® PP membrane that enables radon diffusion. Each of these was connected to the continuous monitor RAD7 or RM-3. The response delay after turning on the water flow through the equilibrator was determined. The fastest detection system was RAD7 + RAD AQUA that was subsequently tested during the in-situ measurement of thermal water in the healing spa and water sources near Cheb and České Budějovice.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
ISSN
0144-8420
e-ISSN
1742-3406
Svazek periodika
186
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2-3
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
406–412
Kód UT WoS článku
000530582200053
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85082779957