A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F17%3A00484914" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/17:00484914 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.008</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

To address challenges associated with climate resilience, health and well-being in urban areas, current policy platforms are shifting their focus from ecosystem-based to nature- based solutions (NBS), broadly defined as solutions to societal challenges that are inspired and supported by nature. NBS result in the provision of co-benefits, such as the improvement of place attractiveness, of health and quality of life, and creation of green jobs. Few frameworks exist for acknowledging and assessing the value of such co-benefits of NBS and to guide cross-sectoral project and policy design and implementation. In this paper, we firstly developed a holistic framework for assessing co-benefits (and costs) of NBS across elements of socio-cultural and socio-economic systems, biodiversity, ecosystems and climate. The framework was guided by a review of over 1700 documents from science and practice within and across 10 societal challenges relevant to cities globally. We found that NBS can have environmental, social and economic co-benefits and/or costs both within and across these 10 societal challenges. On that base, we develop and propose a seven-stage process for situating co-benefit assessment within policy and project implementation. The seven stages include: 1) identify problem or opportunity, 2) select and assess NBS and related actions, 3) design NBS implementation processes, 4) implement NBS, 5) frequently engage stakeholders and communicate co-benefits, 6) transfer and upscale NBS, and 7) monitor and evaluate co-benefits across all stages. We conclude that the developed framework together with the seven-stage co-benefit assessment process represent a valuable tool for guiding thinking and identifying the multiple values of NBS implementation.

Název v anglickém jazyce

A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas

Popis výsledku anglicky

To address challenges associated with climate resilience, health and well-being in urban areas, current policy platforms are shifting their focus from ecosystem-based to nature- based solutions (NBS), broadly defined as solutions to societal challenges that are inspired and supported by nature. NBS result in the provision of co-benefits, such as the improvement of place attractiveness, of health and quality of life, and creation of green jobs. Few frameworks exist for acknowledging and assessing the value of such co-benefits of NBS and to guide cross-sectoral project and policy design and implementation. In this paper, we firstly developed a holistic framework for assessing co-benefits (and costs) of NBS across elements of socio-cultural and socio-economic systems, biodiversity, ecosystems and climate. The framework was guided by a review of over 1700 documents from science and practice within and across 10 societal challenges relevant to cities globally. We found that NBS can have environmental, social and economic co-benefits and/or costs both within and across these 10 societal challenges. On that base, we develop and propose a seven-stage process for situating co-benefit assessment within policy and project implementation. The seven stages include: 1) identify problem or opportunity, 2) select and assess NBS and related actions, 3) design NBS implementation processes, 4) implement NBS, 5) frequently engage stakeholders and communicate co-benefits, 6) transfer and upscale NBS, and 7) monitor and evaluate co-benefits across all stages. We conclude that the developed framework together with the seven-stage co-benefit assessment process represent a valuable tool for guiding thinking and identifying the multiple values of NBS implementation.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Environmental Science & Policy

ISSN

1462-9011

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

77

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

nov

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

15-24

Kód UT WoS článku

000413281800003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85025591068