Different maximum latewood density and blue intensity measurements techniques reveal similar results

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F18%3A00496018" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/18:00496018 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14310/18:00113406

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2018.03.005" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2018.03.005</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2018.03.005" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.dendro.2018.03.005</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Different maximum latewood density and blue intensity measurements techniques reveal similar results

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Annually resolved and absolutely dated Maximum Latewood Density (MXD) and Blue Intensity (BI) measurements are frequently used for reconstructing summer temperature variability over the last centuries to millennia. A direct comparison of the outcome of both methods using similar material is needed due to how quickly this method is being adopted. The application of slightly different measuring systems (hardware) and analysis tools (software) in tandem with different wood samples and preparation procedures further challenges any straightforward assessment. Here we process 26 Norway spruce samples from the upper timberline in the Polish Tatra Mountains with the six most frequently used MXD and BI applications. Although offset is found in the raw MXD and BI data (0.04-0.13 g/cm(3) and 0.45-1.58 dimensionless blue intensity), interannual and longer-term fluctuations are significantly (p < 0.01) positively correlated between all MXD and BI time-series. Our results emphasize the potential of faster and cheaper, as well as overall more user-friendly techniques to generate reliable MXD surrogates for high-frequency dendroclimatological studies. Although the correlations between MXD and BI were lower than within MXD and BI, the results of growth-climate response performed for both proxies show only marginal differences. The obtained level-offset further questions the suitability of joining different density surrogates for developing long-term composite chronologies to reconstruct low-frequency climate variability.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Different maximum latewood density and blue intensity measurements techniques reveal similar results

Popis výsledku anglicky

Annually resolved and absolutely dated Maximum Latewood Density (MXD) and Blue Intensity (BI) measurements are frequently used for reconstructing summer temperature variability over the last centuries to millennia. A direct comparison of the outcome of both methods using similar material is needed due to how quickly this method is being adopted. The application of slightly different measuring systems (hardware) and analysis tools (software) in tandem with different wood samples and preparation procedures further challenges any straightforward assessment. Here we process 26 Norway spruce samples from the upper timberline in the Polish Tatra Mountains with the six most frequently used MXD and BI applications. Although offset is found in the raw MXD and BI data (0.04-0.13 g/cm(3) and 0.45-1.58 dimensionless blue intensity), interannual and longer-term fluctuations are significantly (p < 0.01) positively correlated between all MXD and BI time-series. Our results emphasize the potential of faster and cheaper, as well as overall more user-friendly techniques to generate reliable MXD surrogates for high-frequency dendroclimatological studies. Although the correlations between MXD and BI were lower than within MXD and BI, the results of growth-climate response performed for both proxies show only marginal differences. The obtained level-offset further questions the suitability of joining different density surrogates for developing long-term composite chronologies to reconstruct low-frequency climate variability.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10508 - Physical geography

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LO1415" target="_blank" >LO1415: CzechGlobe 2020 - Rozvoj Centra pro studium dopadů globální změny klimatu</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Dendrochronologia

ISSN

1125-7865

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

49

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

JUN

Stát vydavatele periodika

IT - Italská republika

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

94-101

Kód UT WoS článku

000433995400011

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85044724653