Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F19%3A00519230" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/19:00519230 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://mycokeys.pensoft.net/article/38175/" target="_blank" >https://mycokeys.pensoft.net/article/38175/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175" target="_blank" >10.3897/mycokeys.61.38175</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

To evaluate the importance of morphological and chemical characters used in the recognition of species within the Parimelia omphalodes group, we performed phylogenetic, morphological and chemical analyses of 335 specimens, of which 34 were used for molecular analyses. Phylogenetic analyses, based on ITS rDNA sequences, show that P pinnatifida is distinct from P omphalodes and the most important difference between those species is the development of pseudocyphellae. In P pinnatifida, they are mostly marginal and form white rims along lobes margins, but laminal pseudocyphellae can develop in older parts of thalli and are predominantly connected with marginal pseudocyphellae. In contrast, in P. omphalodes laminal pseudocyphellae are common and arc predominantly not connected to marginal pseudocyphellae. Chemical composition of secondary lichen metabolites in both analysed species is identical and therefore this feature is not diagnostic in species recognition. Few samples of P. discordans, species morphologically similar to P. omphalodes and P. pinnatifida, were also included in the analyses and they are nested within the clade of P. omphalodes, despite the different chemistry (protocetraric acid present versus salazinic acid in P. omphalodes). All taxa of the P. omphalodes group occupy similar niches, but their potential distributions are wider than those currently known. The absence of specimens in some localities may be limited by the photobiont availability. Parmelia omphalodes and P. pinnatifida are moderately selective in photobiont choice as they form associations with at least two or three lineages of Trebouxia clade S. Parmelia pinnatifida, as well as P. discordans are associated with Trebouxia OTU S02 which seems to have a broad ecological amplitude. Other lineages of Trebouxia seem to be rarer, especially Trebouxia sp. OTU S04, which is sometimes present in P. pinnatifida. This study indicates the importance of extensive research including morphology, chemistry and analysis of molecular markers of both bionts in taxonomical studies of lichens.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Morphology and secondary chemistry in species recognition of Parmelia omphalodes group evidence from molecular data with notes on the ecological niche modelling and genetic variability of photobionts

Popis výsledku anglicky

To evaluate the importance of morphological and chemical characters used in the recognition of species within the Parimelia omphalodes group, we performed phylogenetic, morphological and chemical analyses of 335 specimens, of which 34 were used for molecular analyses. Phylogenetic analyses, based on ITS rDNA sequences, show that P pinnatifida is distinct from P omphalodes and the most important difference between those species is the development of pseudocyphellae. In P pinnatifida, they are mostly marginal and form white rims along lobes margins, but laminal pseudocyphellae can develop in older parts of thalli and are predominantly connected with marginal pseudocyphellae. In contrast, in P. omphalodes laminal pseudocyphellae are common and arc predominantly not connected to marginal pseudocyphellae. Chemical composition of secondary lichen metabolites in both analysed species is identical and therefore this feature is not diagnostic in species recognition. Few samples of P. discordans, species morphologically similar to P. omphalodes and P. pinnatifida, were also included in the analyses and they are nested within the clade of P. omphalodes, despite the different chemistry (protocetraric acid present versus salazinic acid in P. omphalodes). All taxa of the P. omphalodes group occupy similar niches, but their potential distributions are wider than those currently known. The absence of specimens in some localities may be limited by the photobiont availability. Parmelia omphalodes and P. pinnatifida are moderately selective in photobiont choice as they form associations with at least two or three lineages of Trebouxia clade S. Parmelia pinnatifida, as well as P. discordans are associated with Trebouxia OTU S02 which seems to have a broad ecological amplitude. Other lineages of Trebouxia seem to be rarer, especially Trebouxia sp. OTU S04, which is sometimes present in P. pinnatifida. This study indicates the importance of extensive research including morphology, chemistry and analysis of molecular markers of both bionts in taxonomical studies of lichens.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10611 - Plant sciences, botany

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

MycoKeys

ISSN

1314-4057

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

61

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

DEC 2019

Stát vydavatele periodika

BG - Bulharská republika

Počet stran výsledku

36

Strana od-do

39-74

Kód UT WoS článku

000502025800002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—