Assessing the vulnerability to land degradation of (not only) rural landscapes using the ESAI index
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F21%3A00554791" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/21:00554791 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/61989592:15310/22:73610913
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/jlecol-2021-0020" target="_blank" >https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/jlecol-2021-0020</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2021-0020" target="_blank" >10.2478/jlecol-2021-0020</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Assessing the vulnerability to land degradation of (not only) rural landscapes using the ESAI index
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Determining the vulnerability of land to degradation is a crucial factor enabling policynmakers to take targeted actions. The main aim of this work was to determine vulnerability tonland degradation using the Environmentally Sensitive Area Index (ESAI) in the territory ofn206 municipalities with extended power (MEPs), regions (NUTS 3) and in the CzechnRepublic (CR). The other two aims were found out i) whether land degradation is affected bynland use characterized by landscape types according to Löw et al. (2006) and ii) whether landndegradation occurred in larger territorial units (regions) or scattered across the CR (innindividual isolated MEPs). The Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) method assesses thenvulnerability of an area to land degradation using a composite index containing indicatorsndivided into four thematic groups: human activity pressure and management intensity,nvegetation cover and vegetation quality, climate, and soil in the assessed area. The ESAInindex is expressed on a semi-quantitative scale ranging from the lowest levels of degradationn(land not affected and land potentially affected by degradation) to the highest level ofndegradation (land at high risk). Most MEPs with a share of more than 70 % of their area werenin the category ,,moderately critical areas,, at risk of land degradation were located in thenCentral Bohemia region (15 MEPs) and in the South Moravia region (14 MEPs). For thenwhole territory of the Czech Republic, 51 % of the territory was found to be criticallynvulnerable to land degradation, and 38 % of the republic area was vulnerable to landndegradation. Vulnerability to land degradation was strongly influenced by the landscapentype. Almost all MEPs with a predominantly agricultural landscapes were criticallynvulnerable to land degradation, as were about half of the MEPs in the forest-agricultural andnurban landscapes and only a few MEPs in the forest landscapes. Given the selectednindicators, the MEP seems to be the appropriate smallest administrative unit to assessnvulnerability to land degradation in the Czech Republic. The map of individual ESAI valuesncan be viewed free of charge online at http://www.imalbes.cz/vysledek.php. We are currentlynpreparing a proposal for appropriate measures to prevent and reduce land degradationnthroughout the territory of the Czech Republic, and our proposals are coordinated withnrepresentatives of the MEPs and regions.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Assessing the vulnerability to land degradation of (not only) rural landscapes using the ESAI index
Popis výsledku anglicky
Determining the vulnerability of land to degradation is a crucial factor enabling policynmakers to take targeted actions. The main aim of this work was to determine vulnerability tonland degradation using the Environmentally Sensitive Area Index (ESAI) in the territory ofn206 municipalities with extended power (MEPs), regions (NUTS 3) and in the CzechnRepublic (CR). The other two aims were found out i) whether land degradation is affected bynland use characterized by landscape types according to Löw et al. (2006) and ii) whether landndegradation occurred in larger territorial units (regions) or scattered across the CR (innindividual isolated MEPs). The Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) method assesses thenvulnerability of an area to land degradation using a composite index containing indicatorsndivided into four thematic groups: human activity pressure and management intensity,nvegetation cover and vegetation quality, climate, and soil in the assessed area. The ESAInindex is expressed on a semi-quantitative scale ranging from the lowest levels of degradationn(land not affected and land potentially affected by degradation) to the highest level ofndegradation (land at high risk). Most MEPs with a share of more than 70 % of their area werenin the category ,,moderately critical areas,, at risk of land degradation were located in thenCentral Bohemia region (15 MEPs) and in the South Moravia region (14 MEPs). For thenwhole territory of the Czech Republic, 51 % of the territory was found to be criticallynvulnerable to land degradation, and 38 % of the republic area was vulnerable to landndegradation. Vulnerability to land degradation was strongly influenced by the landscapentype. Almost all MEPs with a predominantly agricultural landscapes were criticallynvulnerable to land degradation, as were about half of the MEPs in the forest-agricultural andnurban landscapes and only a few MEPs in the forest landscapes. Given the selectednindicators, the MEP seems to be the appropriate smallest administrative unit to assessnvulnerability to land degradation in the Czech Republic. The map of individual ESAI valuesncan be viewed free of charge online at http://www.imalbes.cz/vysledek.php. We are currentlynpreparing a proposal for appropriate measures to prevent and reduce land degradationnthroughout the territory of the Czech Republic, and our proposals are coordinated withnrepresentatives of the MEPs and regions.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10618 - Ecology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Landscape Ecology
ISSN
1803-2427
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
2021
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
14
Stát vydavatele periodika
CZ - Česká republika
Počet stran výsledku
18
Strana od-do
128-145
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85123985401