The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F23%3A00569751" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/23:00569751 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216224:14230/23:00131762 RIV/00216208:11240/23:10466238 RIV/61989592:15310/23:73622988

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01530-3" target="_blank" >https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-023-01530-3</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01530-3" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41599-023-01530-3</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Focus groups are an increasingly popular method for eliciting non-material values and cultural ecosystem services (CES) in the context of studying human-nature relationships. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with the aim of exploring where and how focus groups were used in the research into CES. Furthermore, we aimed to highlight good practices and potential caveats of the use of the focus groups method with respect to recommendations in methodological literature. We employed an inclusive CES classification framework and observed that focus groups were mostly used to research Recreation, Aesthetics, and Education categories. The review also discovered insufficient reporting and methodological inconsistencies in some of the studies. We provide suggestions for more robust and trustworthy applications of the focus group method, which can advance both research in this field and the implementation of the ecosystem services concept in the future.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research: a systematic review

Popis výsledku anglicky

Focus groups are an increasingly popular method for eliciting non-material values and cultural ecosystem services (CES) in the context of studying human-nature relationships. We conducted a systematic review of the literature with the aim of exploring where and how focus groups were used in the research into CES. Furthermore, we aimed to highlight good practices and potential caveats of the use of the focus groups method with respect to recommendations in methodological literature. We employed an inclusive CES classification framework and observed that focus groups were mostly used to research Recreation, Aesthetics, and Education categories. The review also discovered insufficient reporting and methodological inconsistencies in some of the studies. We provide suggestions for more robust and trustworthy applications of the focus group method, which can advance both research in this field and the implementation of the ecosystem services concept in the future.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/TL02000520" target="_blank" >TL02000520: Hodnocení a mapování kulturních ekosystémových služeb v krajině</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS

ISSN

2662-9992

e-ISSN

2662-9992

Svazek periodika

10

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

45

Kód UT WoS článku

000925713000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85147423927