Yield response and water productivity of soybean ( Glycine max L.) to deficit irrigation and sowing time in south-eastern Australia

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F24%3A00586268" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/24:00586268 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424001501?via%3Dihub" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424001501?via%3Dihub</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108815" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108815</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Yield response and water productivity of soybean ( Glycine max L.) to deficit irrigation and sowing time in south-eastern Australia

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The aim of this study was to investigate irrigation strategies and sowing dates that would maximise soybean yield and water productivity. It is based on field experiments conducted during two seasons and simulation modelling. Irrigation treatments were 33%, 66%, 66% plus 100% during pod development and podfill stages, and 100% of crop evapotranspiration (ET c ). In the first season experiment, cvs. Bidgee and Snowy were sown on 15 Nov. In the second season, cv. Bidgee was sown on 15 Nov and 15 Dec. Five sowing dates (1, 15, 30 Nov and 15, 31 Dec) and eight irrigation scenarios were analysed in-silico using the crop model APSIM. For the simulations, the first four irrigation scenarios were set by applying 50%ET c during one of the four growth stages: vegetative stage, flowering stage, pod development and podfilling stage, and maturity stage. The other five irrigation treatments were 0%ET c , 25%ET c , 50%ET c , 75%ET c , and 100%ET c throughout the growing season. Soil water content and aboveground dry matter were measured at regular time intervals. Seed yield, 100seed weight, oil and protein contents were determined at harvest. Water deficit during pod development and podfilling stage had significant effect on seed yield. The flowering stage was the next most sensitive stage for water deficit. During both cropping seasons, the 33% treatment yielded 51% of the fully irrigated reference. The latter had a significantly higher water productivity than all the deficit treatments. Earlysown soybean had higher yield than the late sown soybean. Sowing as late as early December was found to be still suitable for double cropping without significant yield loss. The result of this study is particularly useful for soybean farmers in waterscarce regions, such as south-eastern Australia, who practice double cropping with a tight cropping calendar.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Yield response and water productivity of soybean ( Glycine max L.) to deficit irrigation and sowing time in south-eastern Australia

Popis výsledku anglicky

The aim of this study was to investigate irrigation strategies and sowing dates that would maximise soybean yield and water productivity. It is based on field experiments conducted during two seasons and simulation modelling. Irrigation treatments were 33%, 66%, 66% plus 100% during pod development and podfill stages, and 100% of crop evapotranspiration (ET c ). In the first season experiment, cvs. Bidgee and Snowy were sown on 15 Nov. In the second season, cv. Bidgee was sown on 15 Nov and 15 Dec. Five sowing dates (1, 15, 30 Nov and 15, 31 Dec) and eight irrigation scenarios were analysed in-silico using the crop model APSIM. For the simulations, the first four irrigation scenarios were set by applying 50%ET c during one of the four growth stages: vegetative stage, flowering stage, pod development and podfilling stage, and maturity stage. The other five irrigation treatments were 0%ET c , 25%ET c , 50%ET c , 75%ET c , and 100%ET c throughout the growing season. Soil water content and aboveground dry matter were measured at regular time intervals. Seed yield, 100seed weight, oil and protein contents were determined at harvest. Water deficit during pod development and podfilling stage had significant effect on seed yield. The flowering stage was the next most sensitive stage for water deficit. During both cropping seasons, the 33% treatment yielded 51% of the fully irrigated reference. The latter had a significantly higher water productivity than all the deficit treatments. Earlysown soybean had higher yield than the late sown soybean. Sowing as late as early December was found to be still suitable for double cropping without significant yield loss. The result of this study is particularly useful for soybean farmers in waterscarce regions, such as south-eastern Australia, who practice double cropping with a tight cropping calendar.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10503 - Water resources

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Agricultural Water Management

ISSN

0378-3774

e-ISSN

1873-2283

Svazek periodika

296

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

MAY

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

108815

Kód UT WoS článku

001227108000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85189862197