Value archetypes in future scenarios: the role of scenario co-designers

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F86652079%3A_____%2F25%3A00637993" target="_blank" >RIV/86652079:_____/25:00637993 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol30/iss3/art4/" target="_blank" >https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol30/iss3/art4/</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-15884-300304" target="_blank" >10.5751/ES-15884-300304</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Value archetypes in future scenarios: the role of scenario co-designers

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) relies on future scenarios in its assessments of global social-ecological systems. Scenarios explicitly or implicitly embed normative positions (e.g., values for nature, nature’s contributions to people, good quality of life). Such scenario values shape how scenario narratives evolve, e.g. throughn driving forces, framings, or ways how decisions are legitimized within a given scenario. Initial research in futures studies has examinedhow scenario values depend on whose voices are included in scenario co-design. However, less attention has been paid so far to explicitlyn assessing the extent to which scenario values are associated with different types of scenario co-designers. Our paper expands this knowledge with a set of novel analyses building on the comprehensive review of scenarios in the IPBES values assessment. To this end,n we conducted a formal archetype analysis of 257 scenarios assessed in the IPBES values assessment to identify re-appearing archetypal configurations of values and their link to the actors involved as scenario co-designers. The results show that scenarios valuing nature for itself and its benefits to societal well-being were co-designed by experts and academics less frequently than expected under the assumption of stochastic independence, on the contrary, such scenarios were co-designed more frequently than expected by governmental and community actors. The paper illustrates how archetype analysis can contribute to the validation and furthern development of scientific knowledge feeding into science-policy assessments. The findings are important to acknowledge how scenarios express and possibly re-enforce peoples’ normative positions, and what role values might play when scenarios get translated into realnworld decisions and actions.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Value archetypes in future scenarios: the role of scenario co-designers

Popis výsledku anglicky

The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) relies on future scenarios in its assessments of global social-ecological systems. Scenarios explicitly or implicitly embed normative positions (e.g., values for nature, nature’s contributions to people, good quality of life). Such scenario values shape how scenario narratives evolve, e.g. throughn driving forces, framings, or ways how decisions are legitimized within a given scenario. Initial research in futures studies has examinedhow scenario values depend on whose voices are included in scenario co-design. However, less attention has been paid so far to explicitlyn assessing the extent to which scenario values are associated with different types of scenario co-designers. Our paper expands this knowledge with a set of novel analyses building on the comprehensive review of scenarios in the IPBES values assessment. To this end,n we conducted a formal archetype analysis of 257 scenarios assessed in the IPBES values assessment to identify re-appearing archetypal configurations of values and their link to the actors involved as scenario co-designers. The results show that scenarios valuing nature for itself and its benefits to societal well-being were co-designed by experts and academics less frequently than expected under the assumption of stochastic independence, on the contrary, such scenarios were co-designed more frequently than expected by governmental and community actors. The paper illustrates how archetype analysis can contribute to the validation and furthern development of scientific knowledge feeding into science-policy assessments. The findings are important to acknowledge how scenarios express and possibly re-enforce peoples’ normative positions, and what role values might play when scenarios get translated into realnworld decisions and actions.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10511 - Environmental sciences (social aspects to be 5.7)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EH22_008%2F0004635" target="_blank" >EH22_008/0004635: AdAgriF - Pokročilé metody redukce emisí a sekvestrace skleníkových plynů v zemědělské a lesní krajině pro mitigaci změny klimatu</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Ecology and Society

ISSN

1708-3087

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

30

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CA - Kanada

Počet stran výsledku

15

Strana od-do

4

Kód UT WoS článku

001530543400002

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-105011177690