All

What are you looking for?

All
Projects
Results
Organizations

Quick search

  • Projects supported by TA ČR
  • Excellent projects
  • Projects with the highest public support
  • Current projects

Smart search

  • That is how I find a specific +word
  • That is how I leave the -word out of the results
  • “That is how I can find the whole phrase”

Comparison of methods used for evaluation of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of model chemicals - parabens

The result's identifiers

  • Result code in IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F75010330%3A_____%2F20%3A00013464" target="_blank" >RIV/75010330:_____/20:00013464 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Alternative codes found

    RIV/60460709:41330/20:88249 RIV/61989592:15110/20:73606867

  • Result on the web

    <a href="http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/2020/69_S661.pdf" target="_blank" >http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres/pdf/2020/69_S661.pdf</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.934615" target="_blank" >10.33549/physiolres.934615</a>

Alternative languages

  • Result language

    angličtina

  • Original language name

    Comparison of methods used for evaluation of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of model chemicals - parabens

  • Original language description

    Growing worldwide efforts to replace (reduce) animal testing and to improve alternative in vitro tests which may be more efficient in terms of both time, cost and scientific validity include also genotoxicity/mutagenicity endpoints. The aim of the review article was to summarize currently available in vitro testing approaches in this field, their regulatory acceptance and recommended combinations for classification of chemicals. A study using the combination of Comet Assay performed on two cell lines and the Chromosomal Aberration test on human peripheral lymphocytes was performed with the aim to predict the genotoxic potential of selected paraben esters, serving as a model chemical group. Parabens are widely used in consumer products as preservatives and have been reported to exhibit inconclusive results in numerous genotoxicity studies. The Comet Assay identified Ethylparaben and Benzylparaben as potentially genotoxic. The Chromosomal Aberration test revealed weak genotoxic potential in case of Ethylparaben and positive genotoxicity in case of Butylparaben, Propylparaben and Isopropylparaben. The main reasons for variability seem to be limited water solubility of parabens, determining their bioavailability at the cellular level, and absence of metabolic activation in the Comet Assay. The results confirmed that the Comet Assay should serve as a screening test and should not be used as a stand-alone method for classification of genotoxicity. The weight of evidence approach in risk assessment should be supported with data generated with the use of human relevant in vitro methods based on cells / tissues of human origin.

  • Czech name

  • Czech description

Classification

  • Type

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Article in a specialist periodical, which is included in the Web of Science database

  • CEP classification

  • OECD FORD branch

    30108 - Toxicology

Result continuities

  • Project

    <a href="/en/project/EF16_019%2F000860" target="_blank" >EF16_019/000860: International competitiveness of NIPH in research, development and education in alternative toxicological methods.</a><br>

  • Continuities

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Others

  • Publication year

    2020

  • Confidentiality

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Data specific for result type

  • Name of the periodical

    Physiological Research

  • ISSN

    0862-8408

  • e-ISSN

    1802-9973

  • Volume of the periodical

    69

  • Issue of the periodical within the volume

    Suppl. 4

  • Country of publishing house

    CZ - CZECH REPUBLIC

  • Number of pages

    19

  • Pages from-to

    „S661“-„S679“

  • UT code for WoS article

    000621838200012

  • EID of the result in the Scopus database

    2-s2.0-85102229594