Maximum daily rainfall analysis at selected meteorological stations in the upper Lusatian Neisse River basin

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00020699%3A_____%2F16%3AN0000007" target="_blank" >RIV/00020699:_____/16:N0000007 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.mhwm.pl/Maximum-daily-rainfall-analysis-at-selected-meteorological-stations-in-the-upper-Lusatian-Neisse-River-basin,0,40.html" target="_blank" >http://www.mhwm.pl/Maximum-daily-rainfall-analysis-at-selected-meteorological-stations-in-the-upper-Lusatian-Neisse-River-basin,0,40.html</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Maximum daily rainfall analysis at selected meteorological stations in the upper Lusatian Neisse River basin

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The scope of this study was to assess the usefulness of top probability distributions to describe maximum rainfall data in the Lusatian Neisse River basin, based on eight IMWM-NRI meteorological stations. The research material was composed of 50-year precipitation series of daily totals from 1961 to 2010. Measurement data series were supplemented using weighted average method. Homogeneity for refilled data were investigated by precipitation double aggregation curve. Correlation between the measurement data varied from 96 to 99% and did not indicate a disorder in the homogeneity of rainfall data series. Variability of recorded daily precipitation maxima were studied by linear regression and non-parametric Mann-Kendalls test. Long-term period changes at maximum rainfalls for four station remained as statistically insignificant, and for other four were significant, although the structure of maximums were relatively similar. To describe the measured data, there were used the Fréchet, Gamma, Generalized Exponential Distribution (GED), Gumbel, Log-normal and Weibull distributions. Particular distribution parameters were estimated using the maximum likelihood method. The conformity of the analyzed theoretical distributions with measured data was inspected using the Schwarz Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and also by the relative residual mean square error (RRMSE). Among others, the Gamma, GED, and Weibull distributions fulfilled the compliance criterion for each meteorological station respectively. The BIC criterion indicated GED as the best; however differences were minor between GED on the one hand and the Gamma and Weibull distributions on the other. After the conduction of the RRMSE analysis it was found that, in comparison to the other distributions, GED best describes the measured maximum rainfall data.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Maximum daily rainfall analysis at selected meteorological stations in the upper Lusatian Neisse River basin

Popis výsledku anglicky

The scope of this study was to assess the usefulness of top probability distributions to describe maximum rainfall data in the Lusatian Neisse River basin, based on eight IMWM-NRI meteorological stations. The research material was composed of 50-year precipitation series of daily totals from 1961 to 2010. Measurement data series were supplemented using weighted average method. Homogeneity for refilled data were investigated by precipitation double aggregation curve. Correlation between the measurement data varied from 96 to 99% and did not indicate a disorder in the homogeneity of rainfall data series. Variability of recorded daily precipitation maxima were studied by linear regression and non-parametric Mann-Kendalls test. Long-term period changes at maximum rainfalls for four station remained as statistically insignificant, and for other four were significant, although the structure of maximums were relatively similar. To describe the measured data, there were used the Fréchet, Gamma, Generalized Exponential Distribution (GED), Gumbel, Log-normal and Weibull distributions. Particular distribution parameters were estimated using the maximum likelihood method. The conformity of the analyzed theoretical distributions with measured data was inspected using the Schwarz Bayesian information criterion (BIC) and also by the relative residual mean square error (RRMSE). Among others, the Gamma, GED, and Weibull distributions fulfilled the compliance criterion for each meteorological station respectively. The BIC criterion indicated GED as the best; however differences were minor between GED on the one hand and the Gamma and Weibull distributions on the other. After the conduction of the RRMSE analysis it was found that, in comparison to the other distributions, GED best describes the measured maximum rainfall data.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

DA - Hydrologie a limnologie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Meteorology Hydrology and Water Management

ISSN

2299-3835

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

4

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

53-63

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—