Pitfalls in screening for gestational diabetes in the Czech Republic - patient survey

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023001%3A_____%2F18%3A00078135" target="_blank" >RIV/00023001:_____/18:00078135 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11110/18:10389943 RIV/00216208:11120/18:43917708 RIV/00064165:_____/18:10389943

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.cs-gynekologie.cz/casopisy/ceska-gynekologie/2018-5-12/uskali-screeningu-gestacniho-diabetu-v-ceske-republice-pruzkum-mezi-pacienty-107322" target="_blank" >https://www.cs-gynekologie.cz/casopisy/ceska-gynekologie/2018-5-12/uskali-screeningu-gestacniho-diabetu-v-ceske-republice-pruzkum-mezi-pacienty-107322</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Pitfalls in screening for gestational diabetes in the Czech Republic - patient survey

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Objective: The aim of our survey was to investigate gestational diabetes (GDM) screening policy in the Czech Republic with regards to the correct methodology of the screening. Materials and methods:1100 anonymous questionnaires were distributed among patients of a tertiary level obstetric department from July 2015 to September 2015. Results: 958 (87.0%) questionnaires were found eligible for analysis. 794 (82.9%) of participants had at least one risk factor for GDM development. The oGTT was performed in 751 (94.6%) women at risk of GDM and 153 (93.3%) women at low risk of GDM. From the 904 performed oGTT, 154 (17.0%) were performed completely by recommended standards. In the remaining cases, at least one deviation from standard was noted. The results of oGTT were provided by 364 (40.3%) of respondents. In this subgroup, 71 (19.5%) matched International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group&apos;s (IADPSG) criteria for GDM diagnosis. However, these women were often not those who were evaluated as screening positive by the office gynaecologist. Conclusion: The screening for GDM was frequently not performed in accordance with the national guidelines and the diagnostic criteria used were not uniform.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Pitfalls in screening for gestational diabetes in the Czech Republic - patient survey

Popis výsledku anglicky

Objective: The aim of our survey was to investigate gestational diabetes (GDM) screening policy in the Czech Republic with regards to the correct methodology of the screening. Materials and methods:1100 anonymous questionnaires were distributed among patients of a tertiary level obstetric department from July 2015 to September 2015. Results: 958 (87.0%) questionnaires were found eligible for analysis. 794 (82.9%) of participants had at least one risk factor for GDM development. The oGTT was performed in 751 (94.6%) women at risk of GDM and 153 (93.3%) women at low risk of GDM. From the 904 performed oGTT, 154 (17.0%) were performed completely by recommended standards. In the remaining cases, at least one deviation from standard was noted. The results of oGTT were provided by 364 (40.3%) of respondents. In this subgroup, 71 (19.5%) matched International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group&apos;s (IADPSG) criteria for GDM diagnosis. However, these women were often not those who were evaluated as screening positive by the office gynaecologist. Conclusion: The screening for GDM was frequently not performed in accordance with the national guidelines and the diagnostic criteria used were not uniform.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/NV15-27630A" target="_blank" >NV15-27630A: Úloha endokrinní funkce tukové tkáně v etiopatogenezi gestačního diabetu.</a><br>

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Česká gynekologie

ISSN

1210-7832

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

83

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

6

Strana od-do

348-353

Kód UT WoS článku

000470768600004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85062585538