Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023698%3A_____%2F25%3AN0000002" target="_blank" >RIV/00023698:_____/25:N0000002 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216224:14110/25:00140930 RIV/00216208:11120/25:43928209 RIV/65269705:_____/25:00081713

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-92392-z" target="_blank" >https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-92392-z</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92392-z" target="_blank" >10.1038/s41598-025-92392-z</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    To evaluate the clinical performance and safety of the ONIRY system for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) detection versus three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). A prospective, comparative, multicentre, international study. Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, and Spain. 152 women between the first moments up to 8 weeks after vaginal delivery. Participants underwent EAUS and were allocated to groups based on OASIS classification: A (no perineal tear), B (1st or 2nd degree tear), or C (3rd or 4th degree, anal sphincters affected). Electric impedance was measured in the anal canal using the ONIRY system. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic outcome of impedance spectroscopy versus EAUS. Adverse events were collected. Part II involved in silico modelling and 10-time 10-fold cross-validation for automated analysis. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. 30 women were allocated to group A, 61 to group B, and 61 to group C. The diagnostic outcome was determined for 147 participants. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy were 87.0 +/- 0.5%, 90.6 +/- 2.0%, and 84.6 +/- 1.9%, respectively, compared with EAUS. After data cleaning, the performance metrics of the proposed final ML model for ONIRY were: 90.0 +/- 0.4%, 90.0 +/- 1.2%, and 90.0 +/- 0.7%, respectively. No adverse device effects or deficiencies were observed. By enabling early identification of sphincter injuries, ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy facilitates timely diagnosis and intervention, potentially reducing long-term complications such as faecal incontinence. Its rapid, bedside application in obstetric settings supports immediate postpartum care, complementing digital rectal examination and optimizing clinical decision-making.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicentre clinical study

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    To evaluate the clinical performance and safety of the ONIRY system for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) detection versus three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (EAUS). A prospective, comparative, multicentre, international study. Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, and Spain. 152 women between the first moments up to 8 weeks after vaginal delivery. Participants underwent EAUS and were allocated to groups based on OASIS classification: A (no perineal tear), B (1st or 2nd degree tear), or C (3rd or 4th degree, anal sphincters affected). Electric impedance was measured in the anal canal using the ONIRY system. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic outcome of impedance spectroscopy versus EAUS. Adverse events were collected. Part II involved in silico modelling and 10-time 10-fold cross-validation for automated analysis. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. 30 women were allocated to group A, 61 to group B, and 61 to group C. The diagnostic outcome was determined for 147 participants. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy were 87.0 +/- 0.5%, 90.6 +/- 2.0%, and 84.6 +/- 1.9%, respectively, compared with EAUS. After data cleaning, the performance metrics of the proposed final ML model for ONIRY were: 90.0 +/- 0.4%, 90.0 +/- 1.2%, and 90.0 +/- 0.7%, respectively. No adverse device effects or deficiencies were observed. By enabling early identification of sphincter injuries, ML-assisted impedance spectroscopy facilitates timely diagnosis and intervention, potentially reducing long-term complications such as faecal incontinence. Its rapid, bedside application in obstetric settings supports immediate postpartum care, complementing digital rectal examination and optimizing clinical decision-making.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS

  • ISSN

    2045-2322

  • e-ISSN

    2045-2322

  • Svazek periodika

    15

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    13

  • Strana od-do

    7522

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001436277100005

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-86000102572