Findings from bipolar offspring studies: methodology matters
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023752%3A_____%2F11%3A00001215" target="_blank" >RIV/00023752:_____/11:00001215 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00276.x" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00276.x</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00276.x" target="_blank" >10.1111/j.1751-7893.2011.00276.x</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Findings from bipolar offspring studies: methodology matters
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Abstract: Aim: High-risk studies provide the opportunity to describe the early natural history of bipolar disorder (BD); however, findings have varied substantially. In this review, we compare different methods of ascertainment and assessment, and theirimpact on study findings. Methods: Through a literature search, we identified 11 high-risk studies meeting inclusion criteria for this review. Studies included were those that focused on lifetime psychopathology in the offspring as the main outcome and provided adequate information on the methods of family ascertainment, as well as on parent and offspring assessment. We compared and contrasted psychopathological outcomes in the offspring among the studies using different methods. Results: High-risk studies that identified affected parents through their involvement in neurobiological research and confirmed diagnosis in the parent and offspring through best estimate procedures tended to report lower rates of co-morbidity in the proband pa
Název v anglickém jazyce
Findings from bipolar offspring studies: methodology matters
Popis výsledku anglicky
Abstract: Aim: High-risk studies provide the opportunity to describe the early natural history of bipolar disorder (BD); however, findings have varied substantially. In this review, we compare different methods of ascertainment and assessment, and theirimpact on study findings. Methods: Through a literature search, we identified 11 high-risk studies meeting inclusion criteria for this review. Studies included were those that focused on lifetime psychopathology in the offspring as the main outcome and provided adequate information on the methods of family ascertainment, as well as on parent and offspring assessment. We compared and contrasted psychopathological outcomes in the offspring among the studies using different methods. Results: High-risk studies that identified affected parents through their involvement in neurobiological research and confirmed diagnosis in the parent and offspring through best estimate procedures tended to report lower rates of co-morbidity in the proband pa
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
FL - Psychiatrie, sexuologie
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2011
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
ISSN
1751-7885
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
5
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
AU - Austrálie
Počet stran výsledku
11
Strana od-do
181-191
Kód UT WoS článku
000293178400002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—