Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Alzheimer's disease drugs- in vitro comparison of cholinesterase inhibition and beta-amyloid modulation

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023752%3A_____%2F17%3A43915459" target="_blank" >RIV/00023752:_____/17:43915459 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/60162694:G44__/17:43875762 RIV/62690094:18470/17:50013381 RIV/00216208:11160/17:10360913 RIV/00179906:_____/17:10360913

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://www.eurekaselect.com/148776/article" target="_blank" >http://www.eurekaselect.com/148776/article</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570180814666161228143846" target="_blank" >10.2174/1570180814666161228143846</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Alzheimer's disease drugs- in vitro comparison of cholinesterase inhibition and beta-amyloid modulation

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Background: Alzheimer’s disease is progressive neurodegenerative disease incidence of which has been steadily growing for past decades. Etiology of Alzheimer’s disease consists of multiple micro and macroscopic changes and to this day is not satisfactorily understood. Conventional therapy is based on inhibition of acetylcholinesterase of Alzheimer’s disease is connected with considerable worldwide expenses. Objective: Six clinically used cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, physostigmine, galanthamine, huperzine A, rivastigmine and tacrine) and memantine were compared according to their cholinesterase inhibitory properties. Additionally, the ability of tested compounds to directly inhibit protein aggregation as well as the capability to promote the protein amyloid fibrils depolymerization was determined. Method: Adopted colorimetric assay according to Ellman was used to evaluate the inhibition aktivity against cholinesterases. The ability of compounds to influence agregation inhibition and depolymerization activity was measured by means of thioflavin fluorescence assay. Results: Huperzine A was found to be the most potent, highly selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Tacrine and physostigmine were the most potent butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors. Several inhibitors showed some weak potency to affect protein fibrils aggregation or depolymerization. Namely rivastigmine and galanthamine showed some effect on protein polymerization and depolymerization. Conclusion: Data provided by experiments suggest that clinically used and standard cholinesterase inhibitors influence the protein superstructures however the effect is weak. The need for novel structures of cholinesterase inhibitors with sufficient protein aggregation inhibition and/or depolymerization is evident.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Alzheimer's disease drugs- in vitro comparison of cholinesterase inhibition and beta-amyloid modulation

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Background: Alzheimer’s disease is progressive neurodegenerative disease incidence of which has been steadily growing for past decades. Etiology of Alzheimer’s disease consists of multiple micro and macroscopic changes and to this day is not satisfactorily understood. Conventional therapy is based on inhibition of acetylcholinesterase of Alzheimer’s disease is connected with considerable worldwide expenses. Objective: Six clinically used cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, physostigmine, galanthamine, huperzine A, rivastigmine and tacrine) and memantine were compared according to their cholinesterase inhibitory properties. Additionally, the ability of tested compounds to directly inhibit protein aggregation as well as the capability to promote the protein amyloid fibrils depolymerization was determined. Method: Adopted colorimetric assay according to Ellman was used to evaluate the inhibition aktivity against cholinesterases. The ability of compounds to influence agregation inhibition and depolymerization activity was measured by means of thioflavin fluorescence assay. Results: Huperzine A was found to be the most potent, highly selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. Tacrine and physostigmine were the most potent butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors. Several inhibitors showed some weak potency to affect protein fibrils aggregation or depolymerization. Namely rivastigmine and galanthamine showed some effect on protein polymerization and depolymerization. Conclusion: Data provided by experiments suggest that clinically used and standard cholinesterase inhibitors influence the protein superstructures however the effect is weak. The need for novel structures of cholinesterase inhibitors with sufficient protein aggregation inhibition and/or depolymerization is evident.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30104 - Pharmacology and pharmacy

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2017

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Letters in Drug Design &amp; Discovery

  • ISSN

    1570-1808

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    14

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    6

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    NL - Nizozemsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    8

  • Strana od-do

    743-750

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000404984700013

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85022195251