PVI-only is not enough for all patients with persistent AF: A FLOW-AF subgroup analysis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00023884%3A_____%2F25%3A00010192" target="_blank" >RIV/00023884:_____/25:00010192 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(24)03463-5/fulltext" target="_blank" >https://www.heartrhythmjournal.com/article/S1547-5271(24)03463-5/fulltext</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.037" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.037</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

PVI-only is not enough for all patients with persistent AF: A FLOW-AF subgroup analysis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

BACKGROUND Since the Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial Part II (STAR-AF II), there has been a trend toward pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping can identify active sources of atrial fibrillation (AF) and estimate the electrographic flow consistency (EGFC) of wavefront propagation through substrate, revealing functional AF mechanisms. OBJECTIVE We sought to examine the success of a PVI-only ablation strategy for a redo PeAF/longstanding PeAF population. METHODS Electrographic Flow-Guided Ablation in Redo Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (FLOW-AF [NCT04473963]) prospectively enrolled patients with nonparoxysmal AF undergoing redo ablation at 4 centers. One-minute EGF recordings using 64-pole basket catheters were obtained both pre-PVI and post-PVI following a 20-minute wait and confirmation of electrical isolation of veins. Patients with EGF-identified sources were randomized 1:1 to EGF-guided source ablation vs PVI-only. Patients with no sources were not randomized and mostly received PVI only. RESULTS Study of 85 patients enrolled 24 with EGF-identified sources randomized to PVI only and 23 with no sources receiving PVI only. Of these 47 patients, those with sources (Group 2) had different clinical characteristics including older age and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores compared with those with no sources (Group 1). After PVI only, Group 1 had 70% (16 of 23) freedom from recurrent AF (FFAF) within 1 year vs Group 2 with 35% (8 of 23), P = .018. In addition, patients with high electrographic flow consistency (EGFC) indicative of healthy or normal substrate had 67% (10 of 15) FFAF vs 45% (14 of 31) in those with low EGFC suggestive of abnormal substrate, P = .011. CONCLUSION Success rates in no-sources patients receiving PVI only are better than in those with sources randomized to PVI only. For the clinically heterogenous population of patients with PeAF, the presence of EGF-identified sources matters clinically, and PVI only will not be enough for all patients.

Název v anglickém jazyce

PVI-only is not enough for all patients with persistent AF: A FLOW-AF subgroup analysis

Popis výsledku anglicky

BACKGROUND Since the Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial Part II (STAR-AF II), there has been a trend toward pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping can identify active sources of atrial fibrillation (AF) and estimate the electrographic flow consistency (EGFC) of wavefront propagation through substrate, revealing functional AF mechanisms. OBJECTIVE We sought to examine the success of a PVI-only ablation strategy for a redo PeAF/longstanding PeAF population. METHODS Electrographic Flow-Guided Ablation in Redo Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (FLOW-AF [NCT04473963]) prospectively enrolled patients with nonparoxysmal AF undergoing redo ablation at 4 centers. One-minute EGF recordings using 64-pole basket catheters were obtained both pre-PVI and post-PVI following a 20-minute wait and confirmation of electrical isolation of veins. Patients with EGF-identified sources were randomized 1:1 to EGF-guided source ablation vs PVI-only. Patients with no sources were not randomized and mostly received PVI only. RESULTS Study of 85 patients enrolled 24 with EGF-identified sources randomized to PVI only and 23 with no sources receiving PVI only. Of these 47 patients, those with sources (Group 2) had different clinical characteristics including older age and higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores compared with those with no sources (Group 1). After PVI only, Group 1 had 70% (16 of 23) freedom from recurrent AF (FFAF) within 1 year vs Group 2 with 35% (8 of 23), P = .018. In addition, patients with high electrographic flow consistency (EGFC) indicative of healthy or normal substrate had 67% (10 of 15) FFAF vs 45% (14 of 31) in those with low EGFC suggestive of abnormal substrate, P = .011. CONCLUSION Success rates in no-sources patients receiving PVI only are better than in those with sources randomized to PVI only. For the clinically heterogenous population of patients with PeAF, the presence of EGF-identified sources matters clinically, and PVI only will not be enough for all patients.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

30201 - Cardiac and Cardiovascular systems

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

N - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z neverejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Heart Rhythm

ISSN

1547-5271

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

22

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

5

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

9

Strana od-do

1170-1178

Kód UT WoS článku

001484604900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85208400420