The Effect of Different Tillage Methods on Erosion
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027006%3A_____%2F18%3A00004549" target="_blank" >RIV/00027006:_____/18:00004549 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/agri-2018-0003" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/agri-2018-0003</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/agri-2018-0003" target="_blank" >10.2478/agri-2018-0003</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The Effect of Different Tillage Methods on Erosion
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
During the years 2012-2016 at the site threatened by erosion, the effect of different intensity and depth of soil tillage on the progression of erosion were evaluated on the plots with silage maize. Three different tillage methods were compared and evaluated – conventional tillage, including ploughing (CT), no-tillage using mulch and direct drilling (NT), and minimum tillage treatment with a lower depth of soil cultivation and organic matter incorporation (MT). Water and soil runoff on all of the experimental plots were measured during erosion events. Besides an analysis of naturally occurring rainfall causing erosions, we also conducted the test of soil infiltration abilities with a rain simulator after silage maize harvest. The effect of the tillage on aboveground biomass yield and the input costs was also analyzed. The results showed that NT and MT can significantly reduce water and soil runoff comparing CT. The highest yields were recorded in MT, while the lowest were in CT. Total input costs were higher in the case of NT and MT, but the share of mechanized work was lower for these technologies. Our results showed that NT and MT technologies, as a part of silage maize with a higher plant density stand establishment, should be a useable erosion control measure in areas vulnerable to erosion.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The Effect of Different Tillage Methods on Erosion
Popis výsledku anglicky
During the years 2012-2016 at the site threatened by erosion, the effect of different intensity and depth of soil tillage on the progression of erosion were evaluated on the plots with silage maize. Three different tillage methods were compared and evaluated – conventional tillage, including ploughing (CT), no-tillage using mulch and direct drilling (NT), and minimum tillage treatment with a lower depth of soil cultivation and organic matter incorporation (MT). Water and soil runoff on all of the experimental plots were measured during erosion events. Besides an analysis of naturally occurring rainfall causing erosions, we also conducted the test of soil infiltration abilities with a rain simulator after silage maize harvest. The effect of the tillage on aboveground biomass yield and the input costs was also analyzed. The results showed that NT and MT can significantly reduce water and soil runoff comparing CT. The highest yields were recorded in MT, while the lowest were in CT. Total input costs were higher in the case of NT and MT, but the share of mechanized work was lower for these technologies. Our results showed that NT and MT technologies, as a part of silage maize with a higher plant density stand establishment, should be a useable erosion control measure in areas vulnerable to erosion.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
40106 - Agronomy, plant breeding and plant protection; (Agricultural biotechnology to be 4.4)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2018
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Agriculture (Polnohospodárstvo)
ISSN
0551-3677
e-ISSN
1338-4376
Svazek periodika
64
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
7
Strana od-do
28-34
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85046973918