Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The effects of trapping effort and sources of variability on the estimation of activity-density and diversity of carabids in annual field crops by pitfall trapping; a meta-analysis

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00027006%3A_____%2F21%3A10174571" target="_blank" >RIV/00027006:_____/21:10174571 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.schweizerbart.de/papers/entomologia/list/41#issue6" target="_blank" >https://www.schweizerbart.de/papers/entomologia/list/41#issue6</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2021/1211" target="_blank" >10.1127/entomologia/2021/1211</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The effects of trapping effort and sources of variability on the estimation of activity-density and diversity of carabids in annual field crops by pitfall trapping; a meta-analysis

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Pitfall trapping is widely used for studying the abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods and small vertebrates. Meta-analysis is a powerful technique to synthesize information across studies, but it requires standardization to make study results comparable. It has never been studied how results of pitfall trapping should be standardized to obtain estimates of activity-density and diversity that are comparable across studies. We analysed samples of Carabidae (Coleoptera) from annual crops, reported in 104 publications from Europe and North-America, spanning a period of 42 years, to find (i) a scaling for pitfall trapping effort to assess activity-density and diversity in pitfall catches across studies; and, (ii) to determine the sources of variability in the catch per unit effort. The total catch was proportional to the number of trap days, with a mean of 1.33 beetles/(trap days). The number of species was allometrically related to the trapping effort defined as the product of the number of traps, their perimeter and the time of exposure in the field. The mean species richness was 7.15 species/(m days)(0.25). The size of the catch and the number of species adjusted per unit effort were higher in crops with narrow as compared to wide rows. Other factors were explored but were not influential. There was no significant change in abundance or diversity of carabids in arable land over the 42 years covered. The results give insight in factors affecting carabid abundance and diversity in field studies and enable standardization of pitfall catches across the literature.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The effects of trapping effort and sources of variability on the estimation of activity-density and diversity of carabids in annual field crops by pitfall trapping; a meta-analysis

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Pitfall trapping is widely used for studying the abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods and small vertebrates. Meta-analysis is a powerful technique to synthesize information across studies, but it requires standardization to make study results comparable. It has never been studied how results of pitfall trapping should be standardized to obtain estimates of activity-density and diversity that are comparable across studies. We analysed samples of Carabidae (Coleoptera) from annual crops, reported in 104 publications from Europe and North-America, spanning a period of 42 years, to find (i) a scaling for pitfall trapping effort to assess activity-density and diversity in pitfall catches across studies; and, (ii) to determine the sources of variability in the catch per unit effort. The total catch was proportional to the number of trap days, with a mean of 1.33 beetles/(trap days). The number of species was allometrically related to the trapping effort defined as the product of the number of traps, their perimeter and the time of exposure in the field. The mean species richness was 7.15 species/(m days)(0.25). The size of the catch and the number of species adjusted per unit effort were higher in crops with narrow as compared to wide rows. Other factors were explored but were not influential. There was no significant change in abundance or diversity of carabids in arable land over the 42 years covered. The results give insight in factors affecting carabid abundance and diversity in field studies and enable standardization of pitfall catches across the literature.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    40106 - Agronomy, plant breeding and plant protection; (Agricultural biotechnology to be 4.4)

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2021

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Entomologia generalis

  • ISSN

    0171-8177

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    41

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    6

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    DE - Spolková republika Německo

  • Počet stran výsledku

    14

  • Strana od-do

    553-566

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000722609300001

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85120314036