Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Risk of early relapse following the switch from injectables to oral agents for multiple sclerosis

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F16%3A10323282" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/16:10323282 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216208:11110/16:10323282

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.12929" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.12929</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.12929" target="_blank" >10.1111/ene.12929</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Risk of early relapse following the switch from injectables to oral agents for multiple sclerosis

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Background and PurposeEarly relapse outcomes in long-term stable patients switching from interferon /glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA) to oral therapy are unknown. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare early relapse and progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients switching to oral therapy following a period of stable disease on IFN/GA, relative to a propensity-matched comparator of patients remaining on IFN/GA. MethodsThe MSBase cohort study is a global, longitudinal registry for MS. Time to first 6-month relapse in previously stable MS patients switching from platform injectables (switchers') to oral agents were compared with propensity-matched patients remaining on IFN/GA (stayers') using a Cox marginal model. ResultsThree-hundred and ninety-six switchers were successfully matched to 396 stayers on a 1:1 basis. There was no difference in the proportion of patients recording at least one relapse in the first 1-6 months by treatment arm (7.3% switchers, 6.6% stayers; P = 0.675). The mean annualized relapse rate (P = 0.493) and the rate of first 6-month relapse by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.70, 2.11) were also comparable. There was no difference in the rate of disability progression by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 0.63, 3.26). ConclusionThis is the first study to compare early relapse switch probability in the period immediately following switch to oral treatment in a population previously stable on injectable therapy. There was no evidence of disease reactivation within the first 6 months of switching to oral therapy.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Risk of early relapse following the switch from injectables to oral agents for multiple sclerosis

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Background and PurposeEarly relapse outcomes in long-term stable patients switching from interferon /glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA) to oral therapy are unknown. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare early relapse and progression in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients switching to oral therapy following a period of stable disease on IFN/GA, relative to a propensity-matched comparator of patients remaining on IFN/GA. MethodsThe MSBase cohort study is a global, longitudinal registry for MS. Time to first 6-month relapse in previously stable MS patients switching from platform injectables (switchers') to oral agents were compared with propensity-matched patients remaining on IFN/GA (stayers') using a Cox marginal model. ResultsThree-hundred and ninety-six switchers were successfully matched to 396 stayers on a 1:1 basis. There was no difference in the proportion of patients recording at least one relapse in the first 1-6 months by treatment arm (7.3% switchers, 6.6% stayers; P = 0.675). The mean annualized relapse rate (P = 0.493) and the rate of first 6-month relapse by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.70, 2.11) were also comparable. There was no difference in the rate of disability progression by treatment arm (hazard ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 0.63, 3.26). ConclusionThis is the first study to compare early relapse switch probability in the period immediately following switch to oral treatment in a population previously stable on injectable therapy. There was no evidence of disease reactivation within the first 6 months of switching to oral therapy.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

  • CEP obor

    FH - Neurologie, neurochirurgie, neurovědy

  • OECD FORD obor

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2016

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    European Journal of Neurology

  • ISSN

    1351-5101

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    23

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    4

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    8

  • Strana od-do

    729-736

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000372972300014

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-84955062203