When to assess residual anal sphincter defect after OASI by ultrasound
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F22%3A10450323" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/22:10450323 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11110/22:10450323 RIV/00064211:_____/22:W0000037
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=8NfS2QrM8T" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=8NfS2QrM8T</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.004" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.004</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
When to assess residual anal sphincter defect after OASI by ultrasound
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Objectives: Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are complications of vaginal delivery. Unrepaired anal sphincter after delivery increases the risk of anal incontinence. The aim of our study is to search for residual defect after OASI repair by 4D introital ultrasound (US). We hypothesised that imaging prior to hospital discharge would show the same number of defects as assessment at 3 months. Study design: This is a retrospective analysis of 138 patients with immediate repair after OASIS. Since 2009, we have been routinely inviting all our patients with OASIS to the perineal clinic for postoperative follow-up. We scheduled the first visit before discharge from hospital and followed up with a second visit after three months. During both visits, patients underwent transperineal 4D ultrasound examination. We provided examination while at rest and during contraction; volumes were saved for further evaluation. Results: Eighty-one patients (58.7%) completed both exams and were included in the analysis. Residual external anal sphincter defect was found in 17.3% at the first visit versus 13.6% at the second (delayed) visit. We were not able to assess the sphincter in 9.9% at early versus none in the delayed examination. In 9.9%, the residual defect was not confirmed by the second examination, and in 4.9% the residual defect was missed by the first examination. Conclusions: In conclusion, we have found that a 3 month scan yields a smaller number of defects than a scan before discharge.
Název v anglickém jazyce
When to assess residual anal sphincter defect after OASI by ultrasound
Popis výsledku anglicky
Objectives: Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are complications of vaginal delivery. Unrepaired anal sphincter after delivery increases the risk of anal incontinence. The aim of our study is to search for residual defect after OASI repair by 4D introital ultrasound (US). We hypothesised that imaging prior to hospital discharge would show the same number of defects as assessment at 3 months. Study design: This is a retrospective analysis of 138 patients with immediate repair after OASIS. Since 2009, we have been routinely inviting all our patients with OASIS to the perineal clinic for postoperative follow-up. We scheduled the first visit before discharge from hospital and followed up with a second visit after three months. During both visits, patients underwent transperineal 4D ultrasound examination. We provided examination while at rest and during contraction; volumes were saved for further evaluation. Results: Eighty-one patients (58.7%) completed both exams and were included in the analysis. Residual external anal sphincter defect was found in 17.3% at the first visit versus 13.6% at the second (delayed) visit. We were not able to assess the sphincter in 9.9% at early versus none in the delayed examination. In 9.9%, the residual defect was not confirmed by the second examination, and in 4.9% the residual defect was missed by the first examination. Conclusions: In conclusion, we have found that a 3 month scan yields a smaller number of defects than a scan before discharge.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/NT12147" target="_blank" >NT12147: Specifikace indikace užití implantátů v rekonstrukční operativě defektů pánevního dna</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2022
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
ISSN
0301-2115
e-ISSN
1872-7654
Svazek periodika
277
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
October
Stát vydavatele periodika
IE - Irsko
Počet stran výsledku
4
Strana od-do
8-11
Kód UT WoS článku
000878863200003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85135920273