Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

When to assess residual anal sphincter defect after OASI by ultrasound

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F22%3A10450323" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/22:10450323 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00216208:11110/22:10450323 RIV/00064211:_____/22:W0000037

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=8NfS2QrM8T" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=8NfS2QrM8T</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.004" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.004</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    When to assess residual anal sphincter defect after OASI by ultrasound

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Objectives: Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are complications of vaginal delivery. Unrepaired anal sphincter after delivery increases the risk of anal incontinence. The aim of our study is to search for residual defect after OASI repair by 4D introital ultrasound (US). We hypothesised that imaging prior to hospital discharge would show the same number of defects as assessment at 3 months. Study design: This is a retrospective analysis of 138 patients with immediate repair after OASIS. Since 2009, we have been routinely inviting all our patients with OASIS to the perineal clinic for postoperative follow-up. We scheduled the first visit before discharge from hospital and followed up with a second visit after three months. During both visits, patients underwent transperineal 4D ultrasound examination. We provided examination while at rest and during contraction; volumes were saved for further evaluation. Results: Eighty-one patients (58.7%) completed both exams and were included in the analysis. Residual external anal sphincter defect was found in 17.3% at the first visit versus 13.6% at the second (delayed) visit. We were not able to assess the sphincter in 9.9% at early versus none in the delayed examination. In 9.9%, the residual defect was not confirmed by the second examination, and in 4.9% the residual defect was missed by the first examination. Conclusions: In conclusion, we have found that a 3 month scan yields a smaller number of defects than a scan before discharge.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    When to assess residual anal sphincter defect after OASI by ultrasound

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Objectives: Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are complications of vaginal delivery. Unrepaired anal sphincter after delivery increases the risk of anal incontinence. The aim of our study is to search for residual defect after OASI repair by 4D introital ultrasound (US). We hypothesised that imaging prior to hospital discharge would show the same number of defects as assessment at 3 months. Study design: This is a retrospective analysis of 138 patients with immediate repair after OASIS. Since 2009, we have been routinely inviting all our patients with OASIS to the perineal clinic for postoperative follow-up. We scheduled the first visit before discharge from hospital and followed up with a second visit after three months. During both visits, patients underwent transperineal 4D ultrasound examination. We provided examination while at rest and during contraction; volumes were saved for further evaluation. Results: Eighty-one patients (58.7%) completed both exams and were included in the analysis. Residual external anal sphincter defect was found in 17.3% at the first visit versus 13.6% at the second (delayed) visit. We were not able to assess the sphincter in 9.9% at early versus none in the delayed examination. In 9.9%, the residual defect was not confirmed by the second examination, and in 4.9% the residual defect was missed by the first examination. Conclusions: In conclusion, we have found that a 3 month scan yields a smaller number of defects than a scan before discharge.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30214 - Obstetrics and gynaecology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/NT12147" target="_blank" >NT12147: Specifikace indikace užití implantátů v rekonstrukční operativě defektů pánevního dna</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2022

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    European Journal of Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

  • ISSN

    0301-2115

  • e-ISSN

    1872-7654

  • Svazek periodika

    277

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    October

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    IE - Irsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    4

  • Strana od-do

    8-11

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    000878863200003

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85135920273