Intravascular vs. surface cooling in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients receiving hypothermia after hospital arrival: a post hoc analysis of the TTM2 trial
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F00064165%3A_____%2F25%3A10498437" target="_blank" >RIV/00064165:_____/25:10498437 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11110/25:10498437
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=s1-Cwmf2D0" target="_blank" >https://verso.is.cuni.cz/pub/verso.fpl?fname=obd_publikace_handle&handle=s1-Cwmf2D0</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-025-07883-4" target="_blank" >10.1007/s00134-025-07883-4</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Intravascular vs. surface cooling in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients receiving hypothermia after hospital arrival: a post hoc analysis of the TTM2 trial
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Purpose: To compare the performance of targeted temperature management (TTM) at 33 °C using intravascular (IC) vs. surface-cooling (SFC) devices after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: A post hoc analysis including OHCA patients randomized to hypothermia in the TTM2-trial (NCT02908308) comparing hypothermia with normothermia. The main outcome was cooling performance, defined as the proportion of patients reaching target temperature < 33.5 °C within 4 h, time outside temperature ranges during maintenance, rewarming rate and post-TTM fever. Exploratory outcomes included survival and good functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-3 at 6 months, analyzed using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW). Results: Among 930 patients randomized to hypothermia, 876 were treated with a cooling device and included in this study. Of those, 27.3% received IC devices, while 72.7% received SFC devices. The proportion reaching target temperature within 4 h was higher with IC (IC: 69.6% vs. SFC: 49.2%; p < 0.001). Temperature outside ranges during the cooling period and post-TTM fever were lower with IC compared to SFC (17.2% vs. 39.6%; p < 0.001 and 0% vs. 6.3%; p < 0.001, respectively). In the exploratory IPTW analysis, 6-month survival rates were 55.2% in the IC group and 50.2% in the SFC group (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.89-1.68) and survival with good functional outcome at 6 months was 51.1% patients in the IC group and 44.9% in the SFC (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.93-1.77). Conclusions: Among OHCA patients randomized to hypothermia in the TTM2 study, intravascular cooling, compared with surface cooling, was associated with better cooling performance.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Intravascular vs. surface cooling in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients receiving hypothermia after hospital arrival: a post hoc analysis of the TTM2 trial
Popis výsledku anglicky
Purpose: To compare the performance of targeted temperature management (TTM) at 33 °C using intravascular (IC) vs. surface-cooling (SFC) devices after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods: A post hoc analysis including OHCA patients randomized to hypothermia in the TTM2-trial (NCT02908308) comparing hypothermia with normothermia. The main outcome was cooling performance, defined as the proportion of patients reaching target temperature < 33.5 °C within 4 h, time outside temperature ranges during maintenance, rewarming rate and post-TTM fever. Exploratory outcomes included survival and good functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-3 at 6 months, analyzed using Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW). Results: Among 930 patients randomized to hypothermia, 876 were treated with a cooling device and included in this study. Of those, 27.3% received IC devices, while 72.7% received SFC devices. The proportion reaching target temperature within 4 h was higher with IC (IC: 69.6% vs. SFC: 49.2%; p < 0.001). Temperature outside ranges during the cooling period and post-TTM fever were lower with IC compared to SFC (17.2% vs. 39.6%; p < 0.001 and 0% vs. 6.3%; p < 0.001, respectively). In the exploratory IPTW analysis, 6-month survival rates were 55.2% in the IC group and 50.2% in the SFC group (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.89-1.68) and survival with good functional outcome at 6 months was 51.1% patients in the IC group and 44.9% in the SFC (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.93-1.77). Conclusions: Among OHCA patients randomized to hypothermia in the TTM2 study, intravascular cooling, compared with surface cooling, was associated with better cooling performance.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30221 - Critical care medicine and Emergency medicine
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Intensive Care Medicine
ISSN
0342-4642
e-ISSN
1432-1238
Svazek periodika
51
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
US - Spojené státy americké
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
721-730
Kód UT WoS článku
001477810800001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-105004217419